Yes sir ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
> Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:24 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.Virus] VBE attachments
>
> Everyone is banning vbe attachment
Everyone is banning vbe attachments, correct?
http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32pegasa.html
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archi
Regarding the virus discussed in this post.
Here the official answer from f-prot after sending the file to them
"The file that you sent us through our submission form was analyzed as a
security risk named W32/Mitglieder.FI.
Detection is available in the latest release of our virus signature file
... and F-Secure notes that they've hit a record of
publishing 12 pattern updates in one day.
Andrew 8)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:28 AMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Se
Oops, McAfee just slipped. Since 1:09 p.m. EST on my system we
received 52 undetected zips (just over an hour). We caught these all
with a custom filter.
Matt
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
FYI, Kaspersky reports that
they're now up to something like 20 new variants of Bagle between
Mond
I can confirm that F-Prot was again missing the Bagle zips this
morning, however McAfee seems to have caught every one of them with a
generic Bagle definition unlike yesterday. As of 2 p.m., F-Prot was
still missing these Bagles.
Matt
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
FYI, Kaspersky reports th
FYI, Kaspersky reports that they're now up to something
like 20 new variants of Bagle between Monday and Tuesday.
Andrew 8)