Hi,
the second beta release of the GNOME 3.11 development cycle is finally here!
With this release we are officially now in "The String Freeze" [1] (that
stacks with all the current freezes):
- String Freeze: no string changes may be made without confirmation
from the l10n team (gnome-i18n@) an
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:05:30PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> I was mostly concerned by our technical infrastructure for developer
> documentation, but that itself has of course been driven by the
> content we produced (or wanted to produce), so I don't think they can
> really be separated.
F
Hi.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
> Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any
> implementation has been undertaken by GNOME as of yet.
that is correct.
Cheers,
Tobi
___
desktop-devel-list m
Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any
implementation has been undertaken by GNOME as of yet.
Stef
On 06.03.2014 16:09, Oliver Propst wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm active in the GNOME engagement team and are currently working on a
> article about the 2012-2013 privacy campa
On 6 March 2014 10:07, Christoph Reiter wrote:
> (responding to the wrong mail since I just subscribed and don't bother
> modifying mail headers..)
>
> Since it wasn't mentioned so far; outside of gnome.org, on the Python
> side of things, there exists the GTK+ 3 tutorial [0] maintained by
> Sebas
(responding to the wrong mail since I just subscribed and don't bother
modifying mail headers..)
Since it wasn't mentioned so far; outside of gnome.org, on the Python
side of things, there exists the GTK+ 3 tutorial [0] maintained by
Sebastian Pölsterl (accepts pull requests, but isn't actively wo
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:20:19PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> this blog from Stack Overflow about the introduction of their
> localised version in Portuguese gives a nice introduction to the
> issue, and some very interesting discussion points:
>
> http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2014/02/cant-w