One the eve of 3.7.91, here is a summary of the list of open bugs
currently marked as 3.8 blocker. This list has 32 bugs on it today.
That may sound a lot, but keep it in perspective: we've already closed
113 bugs that were marked as "3.8 blocker". Any help with getting the
remaining 32 bugs fixed
On Mar 5, 2013 5:57 AM, "Matthias Clasen" wrote:
> 694771 mutter menus broken in 3.7.10
This was fixed in 3.7.91, somehow we missed closing the bug.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listin
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 23:57 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> * related to gnome goal: libsecret migration:
> 679918 epiphanylibsecret migration
I was waiting on a libsecret release, but I've finally merged the
secret-migration to master and this bug is fixed.
Claudio
On 03/05/2013 05:57 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> One the eve of 3.7.91, here is a summary of the list of open bugs
> currently marked as 3.8 blocker. This list has 32 bugs on it today.
> That may sound a lot, but keep it in perspective: we've already closed
> 113 bugs that were marked as "3.8 block
On 4 March 2013 23:57, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> * related to feature 'drop fallback mode / add classic mode':
> 688665 gdm drop gdm fallback session
Given that "drop fallback mode" is an anti-feature, I have a hard time
considering that bug as a 3.8 blocker. It sounds like the maintainer
wan
On 5 March 2013 19:49, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> this makes it very difficult for us to
> ship the latest GNOME promptly in Ubuntu
>
I thought ubuntu is shipping 3.6 this cycle and ubuntu gnome already
dropped fallback??
*
Thanks,*
Justin
___
desktop-deve
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 23:57, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> * related to feature 'drop fallback mode / add classic mode':
>> 688665 gdm drop gdm fallback session
>
> Given that "drop fallback mode" is an anti-feature, I have a hard time
> considerin
On 5 March 2013 10:46, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> If you want to keep fallback mode alive, I suggest getting engaged in
> building that right place - this bug has been on the 3.8 blocker list
> since before Xmas, so it is not exactly news that we were going to do
> this...
You can't break the Freez
What's the specific freeze break? Dropping the simple-greeter from gdm?
Dropping gnome-panel, etc. from the official module set? We're not in hard
code freeze yet, and neither of these are UI freeze breaks, as far as I
understood it.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 5 M
On 5 March 2013 13:13, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> What's the specific freeze break? Dropping the simple-greeter from gdm?
> Dropping gnome-panel, etc. from the official module set? We're not in hard
> code freeze yet, and neither of these are UI freeze breaks, as far as I
> understood it.
Droppin
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Dropping the simple greeter from gdm breaks feature freeze. Removing a
> feature is even more disruptive than adding a feature so I thought it
> was understood that we shouldn't be doing these changes after feature
> freeze without getting
On 5 March 2013 22:15, Ray Strode wrote:
>
> I don't have a problem making it build time optional configure switch
> for 3.8 and then moving it to a separate git module for 3.10
If you dont mind the extra work, I think this is the best solution
(and set to not build the simple greater by default)
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> If you dont mind the extra work, I think this is the best solution
> (and set to not build the simple greater by default)
wasn't any extra work for me. walters beat me to it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695414
--Ray
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
