On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:41 +0100, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 6:30 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I honestly don't see the point of supporting runtime tests with cross
> > compilation in the build tool. I mean, the most that the tool can do is
> > give an
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 09:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> Jaap, I am well aware of this, but I am not committing a WAF script to
> each project repository is the best way to go. Each script is 100KB
> semi-binary file. Every time I update WAF I would need to essentially
> add 100KB to
On 02/12/2007, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
> version of gnome-python:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
>
> The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
>
On Dec 3, 2007 6:30 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I honestly don't see the point of supporting runtime tests with cross
> compilation in the build tool. I mean, the most that the tool can do is
> give an error message saying the test cannot be run. How will that
> hel
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:15 +0100, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 4:03 PM, Daniel Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 3, 2007 3:51 PM, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > autoconf has standard support for running tests on the local machine for
> > > example to determin
On Dec 3, 2007 4:03 PM, Daniel Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 3:51 PM, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > autoconf has standard support for running tests on the local machine for
> > example to determine the word size, if the networking layer supports
Ah, ofc runtime
On Dec 3, 2007 3:51 PM, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> autoconf has standard support for running tests on the local machine for
> example to determine the word size, if the networking layer supports
> abstract sockets, and so on. If the build is being cross-compiled these
> tests fail st
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:37 +0100, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by lack of crosscompiling support.
>
> Crosscompiling needs very little.
>
> 1. A compiler that runs on your host OS, and produces output for some
> target OS/arch.
> 2. A set of dependencies (if any) built for
On Dec 3, 2007 2:21 PM, Nicolas Trangez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Need to write up on this, no time now though, sorry. One of the primary
> reasons is the lack of crosscompiling support.
I'm not sure what you mean by lack of crosscompiling support.
Crosscompiling needs very little.
1. A compi
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>
>
> 2007/12/2, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100%
> WAF-ied
>
On Dec 3, 2007 2:27 PM, Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is going to be a pain for distributions to learn yet another build
> systems, which might need patching to fix one or another bug.
The Debian Developer(s) responsible for the XMMS2 packages haven't had
much (if any) trubble wi
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 12:58 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> 2007/12/3, Nicolas Trangez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > Does anyone has done this mkenum thing with waf already?
>
>
> http://git.nicolast.be/?p=waf.git;a=
Le lundi 03 décembre 2007 à 12:58 +, Alberto Ruiz a écrit :
>
> Might need some more work.
>
> Anyway, I still need to write up on this, but I'm not
> convinced waf is a
> great solution for the overall GNOME project.
>
> Why not?
It is going to be
2007/12/3, Nicolas Trangez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > Does anyone has done this mkenum thing with waf already?
>
>
> http://git.nicolast.be/?p=waf.git;a=commitdiff;h=e64ff5a6629bdf081c3a2d7ed5326a3fd88e5e28
Cool, do you want me to apply it
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Does anyone has done this mkenum thing with waf already?
http://git.nicolast.be/?p=waf.git;a=commitdiff;h=e64ff5a6629bdf081c3a2d7ed5326a3fd88e5e28
Might need some more work.
Anyway, I still need to write up on this, but I'm not convinced w
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> So far, libwnck looks pretty simple, except for the glib-mkenums which seems
> to call a lot of shell commands.
>
> What's exactly glib-mkenum used for?
autogenerates the enumeration types (GEnum and GFlags) from the headers,
like glib
2007/12/2, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
> > version of gnome-python:
> >
> > http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
> >
> > T
On Dec 3, 2007 10:35 AM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jaap, I am well aware of this, but I am not committing a WAF script to
> each project repository is the best way to go. Each script is 100KB
> semi-binary file. Every time I update WAF I would need to essentially
> add
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:48 +0100, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 11:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
> > version of gnome-python:
> >
> > http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
On Dec 2, 2007 11:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
> version of gnome-python:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
>
> The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, wh
On Dec 2, 2007 5:07 PM, Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 16:55 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are pretty
> > impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times for
> > building releases for garnome
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 16:55 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are pretty
> impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times for
> building releases for garnome users, release team members, and others.
Time I don't think as intere
On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
> version of gnome-python:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
>
> The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, whi
2007/12/2, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
> version of gnome-python:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
>
> The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
> all you n
In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied
version of gnome-python:
http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2
The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is
all you need to build) is 249K, while an autotools version is 424K. I
could redu
25 matches
Mail list logo
