thing, but I think is a
> really unnecessary bug (in gtk2), which I haven't the skills to fix it
> my self.
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
> - alex
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Michael Ikey Doherty
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 11:29 +0200
Feb 15, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Michael Ikey Doherty <
michael.i.dohe...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 11:29 +0200, alex diavatis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > GNOME 3 GTK3 theme specifications point that themes (user-specific)
> > should be installed
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 11:29 +0200, alex diavatis wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> GNOME 3 GTK3 theme specifications point that themes (user-specific)
> should be installed under ~/.local/share/themes.
> That won't work for GTK2, and GTK2 themes are required to be installed
> in ~
Hello,
GNOME 3 GTK3 theme specifications point that themes (user-specific) should
be installed under ~/.local/share/themes.
That won't work for GTK2, and GTK2 themes are required to be installed in
~/.themes
This is a known bug in bugzilla.gnome (cant find #) and GTK2 themes should
be acces
Em Sun, 2013-07-28 às 18:07 +, Bastien Nocera escreveu:
> The branch 'gnome-3-10' was created pointing to:
>
> 08c1767... rotation: Don't check rotation for DVDs either
Unfortunately, I don't think I'll have time to finish the work on Videos
for GNOME 3.
>> For me Ctrl+PGUP/PGDN is to browse in order the tabs. Alt+Tab has
always
>> carried more a "recently used", or "history" semantic, so I don't think
>> they're the same.
Hmm. Sounds sane!
> Just saw you're right, some applications are already implementing
> Ctrl+Tab that way, like Firefox and
Le 19/06/2013 12:56, Luis Menina a écrit :
> Le 18/06/2013 10:40, bugs a écrit :
>> What can be improved is the key-combination for switching between the
>> tabs. For a weird, unknown reason, we don't rely on Ctrl+Tab for switching
>> between tabs in most applications. That will fit much more in th
Le 18/06/2013 10:40, bugs a écrit :
> What can be improved is the key-combination for switching between the
> tabs. For a weird, unknown reason, we don't rely on Ctrl+Tab for switching
> between tabs in most applications. That will fit much more in the
> expectations of the users, than Ctrl+PGUP/PG
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:38:56 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi
wrote:
> hi Luis;
>
> On 17 June 2013 17:09, Luis Menina wrote:
>
>> I also whish one could cycle through the tabs of a tabbed application
>> using just Alt+Tab too, gnome shell handling the tabs, to find the tab
>> of the same application I w
Hi Emmanuele,
Le 17/06/2013 18:38, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
On 17 June 2013 17:09, Luis Menina wrote:
I also whish one could cycle through the tabs of a tabbed application
using just Alt+Tab too, gnome shell handling the tabs, to find the tab
of the same application I was using 5s ago.
you
I agree we shouldn't scroll through tabs with Alt-Tab, but I can
understand where the problem comes from.
Very frequently I click on a link in Evolution or "open containing
folder" or a file downloaded with Epiphany, and instead of having a new
Nautilus/Epiphany tab open, the result is a whole new
hi Luis;
On 17 June 2013 17:09, Luis Menina wrote:
> I also whish one could cycle through the tabs of a tabbed application
> using just Alt+Tab too, gnome shell handling the tabs, to find the tab
> of the same application I was using 5s ago.
you really, *really* don't want this.
I currently ha
Hi,
Le 30/05/2013 17:52, אנטולי קרסנר a écrit :
> This is a lot of open windows, so I group them into workspaces. But it
> doesn't help, I still feel too inefficient sometimes, and I'd like to
> know how I can improve my desktop worflow and usage.
You're not alone. I still have trouble getting th
ade small extension:
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/310/alt-tab-workspace/
It displays only apps and windows from active workspace, so if I have 3 apps
on my programming workspace, I can quickly Alt+Tab through them. Maybe it's
not sane default for gnome-shell, but you may find it useful, if
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 18:52 +0300, אנטולי קרסנר wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi,
> I've been using Gnome 3.4.2 for long time. I started using Gnome 3
> because I believe in innovation and evolution through trial and error.
> But I noticed a problematic recurring pattern in my usage of
Hello,
I've been using Gnome 3.4.2 for long time. I started using Gnome 3
because I believe in innovation and evolution through trial and error.
But I noticed a problematic recurring pattern in my usage of my laptop
(I don't carry it anywhere, and it's has a large screen, so it ca
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:48:40AM +0100, stefan skoglund(agj) wrote:
> The RedHat thing is a really longlived bug in redhats bugzilla about
> gvfs metadata induced overload of NFS servers. That bug is rather bad
> and i think that if it isn't resolved it will make GNOME3 impossible to
> run in NFS
mån 2013-03-18 klockan 09:10 -0700 skrev Sriram Ramkrishna:
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:58 AM, stefan skoglund(agj)
wrote:
> fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:32 -0400 skrev Matthias Clasen:
>
>
> I dont think Redhat wants to have the same type of
> conversation
We have a gnome-integration list dedicated to integrating GNOME into
environments. That would be a great place to discuss and figure it out.
I'd like to see if we can make GNOME better in environments like yours.
Login performance is slow even without NFS. Boot up performance to GDM
seems to wor
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:45 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> The newly designed (or redesigned) GNOME 3 applications have some
> common UI elements. For example, if you look at the following designs,
> you will notice that the main toolbar, "selection" toolbar, main icon
> view,
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 11:54 -0400, Erick Pérez Castellanos wrote:
> The way I see it, is that we need to provide some widgets to do the
> stuff following the guldelines of the new Gnome Design
> As Allan says here [1], there's a new kind of toolbar, which have some
> stuff in common, and it will be
The way I see it, is that we need to provide some widgets to do the
stuff following the guldelines of the new Gnome Design
As Allan says here [1], there's a new kind of toolbar, which have some
stuff in common, and it will be worthy to look into the possibility of
make a specific widget for it, and
>> The newly designed (or redesigned) GNOME 3 applications have some
>> common UI elements. For example, if you look at the following designs,
>> you will notice that the main toolbar, "selection" toolbar, main icon
>> view, etc. are quite similar:
>
> S
Hi,
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> The newly designed (or redesigned) GNOME 3 applications have some
> common UI elements. For example, if you look at the following designs,
> you will notice that the main toolbar, "selection" toolbar, main icon
>
Hey Debarshi,
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:45 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> We may benefit from having a way to share these widgets among the
> applications. Currently, what I have been doing, for gnome-photos, is
> to copy-paste the *.c/*.h files from the gnome-documents tree.
>
> One downside of d
The newly designed (or redesigned) GNOME 3 applications have some
common UI elements. For example, if you look at the following designs,
you will notice that the main toolbar, "selection" toolbar, main icon
view, etc. are quite similar: +
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Box
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Emmanuel Pacaud wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to make replace the PgDown
> sequence.
PgUp/PgDown are the standard GNOME shortcuts for switching between
tabs, so I don't think removing them is a good idea. Obviously we could add
left/right as additional shortcu
- Mensaje original -
> De: Juanjo Marín
> Para: surma ; "desktop-devel-list@gnome.org"
>
> CC:
> Enviado: Jueves 3 de Mayo de 2012 18:23
> Asunto: Re: Gnome 3 issues
>
>it is totally functional IMHO.
>
BTW, I recommend GNOME 3.4, pr
>Why did you screw up gnome menus?
>I've
been using gnome since 2000, and it
>has been the best desktop
available until gnome 3
>came. I had a terrible car accident 31. Dets
2005,
>which caused me to spend 6 months in coma.
>That messed up my
hands and I can't use mouse
Le jeudi 03 mai 2012 à 16:56 +0200, Florian Müllner a écrit :
> That messed up my hands and I can't use mouse.
> That is why I liked gnome 2, everything could be done
> without mouse.
>
> And the same is true for Gnome3 - to navigate to an application, you
> can use
> PgD
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:40 AM, surma wrote:
> That messed up my hands and I can't use mouse.
> That is why I liked gnome 2, everything could be done
> without mouse.
>
And the same is true for Gnome3 - to navigate to an application, you can use
PgDown( | | )
(or , select "Applications
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 09:40 +0300, surma wrote:
> Hello,
> On to the point.
> Why did you screw up gnome menus?
> I've
> been using gnome since 2000, and it
> has been the best desktop
> available until gnome 3
> came. I had a terrible car accident 31. Dets
> 20
Hello,
On to the point.
Why did you screw up gnome menus?
I've
been using gnome since 2000, and it
has been the best desktop
available until gnome 3
came. I had a terrible car accident 31. Dets
2005,
which caused me to spend 6 months in coma.
That messed up my
hands and I can't use mous
Sounds like the issue comes out of text strings referring to the
applications, not from copyright/trademark issues with the names
themselves.
I guess I would recommend this approach:
Copyright statement
"copyright 2012 Gnome Web Browser"
"copyright 2012 Gnome Files" or "copyright 2012 Gnome File
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:32 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:20:32AM -0700, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:53 +0200, Luc Pionchon wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > - copyright notices and such, should the name be so generic? And in
> > > translations, should th
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:20:32AM -0700, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:53 +0200, Luc Pionchon wrote:
> > [...]
> > - copyright notices and such, should the name be so generic? And in
> > translations, should the name be really translated here? Shouldn't it
> > be made more e
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 08:53 +0200, Luc Pionchon wrote:
> [...]
> - copyright notices and such, should the name be so generic? And in
> translations, should the name be really translated here? Shouldn't it
> be made more explicit for example with adding "GNOME", like in
> "Copyright 2012 - the GNOME
Hello,
there is a discussion [1] on the internationalization mailing list
about GNOME 3 core application names, the ambiguous situation they
bring, and the difficulties it brings for translation. I try to
summarize to the best the issue. Read the thread [1] and contact
people for more information
Benjamin Otte writes:
> I have no idea how all this stuff works, I just know it's kinda suboptimal and
> underdefined[1].
>
> But what I've been doing for modifying my own theme:
>
> mkdir -p ~/.themes/MyTheme/gtk-3.0
> cat > ~/.themes/MyTheme/gtk-3.0/gtk.css << EOF
> @import url("/usr/share/them
I have no idea how all this stuff works, I just know it's kinda suboptimal and
underdefined[1].
But what I've been doing for modifying my own theme:
mkdir -p ~/.themes/MyTheme/gtk-3.0
cat > ~/.themes/MyTheme/gtk-3.0/gtk.css << EOF
@import url("/usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-3.0/gtk.css");
/* My ch
So, Gnome 3 uses a form of CSS for its theming. I'll go ahead and give
it a good solid plusplus for that. Easy, understandable customization.
Or at least one would think. So, CSS being the nice cascadey thing it
is, I should be able to override a theme by placing something in a
spe
se.
sri
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:25:16PM +0530, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
>> > Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel
>> and I
>> > would like to know if it suppor
>
>De: Narek Babadjanyan
>Para: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
>Enviado: lunes 12 de septiembre de 2011 16:55
>Asunto: GNOME 3 panel applets
>
>
>Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
>would like to
Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:25:16PM +0530, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
> > Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and
> I
> > would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's panel, if no :'( , and if
> yes,
> > could you p
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:25:16PM +0530, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
> Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
> would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's panel, if no :'( , and if yes,
> could you please tell me where is the appropriate docu
GNOME3 does not use gnome-panel. You change change GNOME3's top panel
with GNOME Shell Extension.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
> Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
> would like to know if it supports GNOME 3
Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's panel, if no :'( , and if yes,
could you please tell me where is the appropriate documentation?
___
desktop-devel-list ma
still much better
than one complete bowl with all apps thrown in it. This should be kept
and improved.
And yes, Meta key plus first two or three letters of applications in
overview mode is a *killer* feature of GNOME 3 and should be treated
as such, with tips for new users how to use it. And contra
2011/9/4 Jasper St. Pierre
> Have you seen "Killing Mode Switch"[0]? It wasn't implemented in 3.2
> because of time constraints, but it's planned.
>
The more important reason for not doing it in the 3.2 time frame was that
the design is unfinished (quote Jakub: "don't work on that yet"), but yea
Seems awesome! It's definately an improvement over the current way of
adding dock bar shortcuts. And it looks great too :)
Still I like to navigate through application categories without moving
my mouse from corner to corner or click multiple times to find the right
application.
Maybe we need all
Have you seen "Killing Mode Switch"[0]? It wasn't implemented in 3.2
because of time constraints, but it's planned.
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/log/?p=1181
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Xavier Cho wrote:
> Ok, I can admit the overview mode is somewhat more user friendly than
> alt-f2. But stil
Ok, I can admit the overview mode is somewhat more user friendly than
alt-f2. But still, demanding users to use their keyboard to perform such
basic task as launching an application is not the way to achieve user
friendliness.
To be more precise, I suppose all those methods of launching
applicatio
ace. It's not going to happen for 3.2, unfortunately.
> 2011-09-04 (일), 02:10 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre:
>> You can pin apps to the dash by dragging them there, or right-click on
>> its icon in the dash.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Xavier Cho wrote:
>&
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Xavier Cho wrote:
> In that case, we can just remove the application menu altogether and let
> them alt-f2 type commands to launch applications.
Thats not the same thing at all. In case of alt-f2, user has to know
the exact and complete name of the application. W
On Sun 04 Sep 2011 08:31, Xavier Cho writes:
> On a side note, I really like to see kind of a 'switchable' dock so I
> could change set of applications on it according to task currently I'm
> on. For example, when I do some music related work, I often use jackd
> related applications like ardour,
You can pin apps to the dash by dragging them there, or right-click on
> its icon in the dash.
>
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Xavier Cho wrote:
> > I've been using Gnome 3 for some months, and overall I think it's definitely
> > a step in the right direction.
mouse clicks to key typing.
2011-09-04 (일), 01:58 -0400, Jeremy Bicha:
> On 4 September 2011 01:43, Xavier Cho wrote:
> > Most of all, I think Gnome 3 requires too much user interaction when
> > navigating in the program menu. In the days of global application menu, when
>
You can pin apps to the dash by dragging them there, or right-click on
its icon in the dash.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Xavier Cho wrote:
> I've been using Gnome 3 for some months, and overall I think it's definitely
> a step in the right direction. However, as a long time G
On 4 September 2011 01:43, Xavier Cho wrote:
> Most of all, I think Gnome 3 requires too much user interaction when
> navigating in the program menu. In the days of global application menu, when
> you need to launch an application all you need to do was 1) click on the
> panel menu
I've been using Gnome 3 for some months, and overall I think it's definitely a
step in the right direction. However, as a long time Gnome 1&2 user, I find it
lacking in some aspects in terms of usability and features.
Most of all, I think Gnome 3 requires too much user in
velopers decided to directly use the C library instead for the GNOME 3
> port).
>
> So unless anybody complains about those 5 modules, I'll file a bug to
> get them archived.
No objection => I filed https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65423
Il 10/06/2011 12:07, Vincent Untz ha scritto:
Hi,
I guess everyone knows that GNOME 2 applets don't work in GNOME 3, and
talking here and there, the feedback I got is that it wasn't worth
creating a bridge to be able to load those in the GNOME 3 panel.
As several applets are not g
Hi,
I guess everyone knows that GNOME 2 applets don't work in GNOME 3, and
talking here and there, the feedback I got is that it wasn't worth
creating a bridge to be able to load those in the GNOME 3 panel.
As several applets are not going to be ported to GNOME 3 (either because
t
Hi guys,
I thought that some people here might appreciate some positive feedback
on the GNOME 3 release which came in to gnome-press-contact.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
dne...@gnome.org
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Gnome Developers,
I apologize, but I wasn't
>> What is the correct moduleset to use to build Gnome 3.0?
>
> gnome-suites-core.
>
> gnome-suites-core-deps are the dependencies of gnome-suites-core.
>
>
I indicated only the problem moduleset(s). I have the corresponding
gnome-core modulesets as well. I am asking about the versions, and
the e
Please avoid cross-posting. This does not look like content for
desktop-devel@ - please remove that address for potential responses.
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 10:13 -0700, bsquared wrote:
> What is the correct moduleset to use to build Gnome 3.0?
gnome-suites-core.
gnome-suites-core-deps are the dep
Hello,
What is the correct moduleset to use to build Gnome 3.0? I have tried
both of these:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/3.0.0/gnome-suites-core-deps-3.0.0.modules
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/3.0.0/gnome-suites-core-deps-3.0.1.modules
But the following lines
On 04/18/2011 09:52 AM, Justin Joseph wrote:
Thank you!!! And show me how do I access so called 'hibernate' in gnome
shell.
I didn't ask for a name. I asked for a feature.
One more issue. I have just one user account in my system. Still I get
'logout' and 'switch user' in the menus. and obviousl
El dom, 17-04-2011 a las 23:39 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi escribió:
> hi;
>
> On 17 April 2011 23:31, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El dom, 17-04-2011 a las 22:47 +0200, Andre Klapper escribió:
> >> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> > Regarding gnome-tweak-tool, is it able to enable
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > The correct use case for any electronic device is power on when using
> it,
> > > power off when not.
> > I couldn't agree any more. The default behaviour should be
> > shut-down/restart.
>
> In the suspend case there are very good reasons
Jan de Groot a écrit:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 08:45 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> This is why I think GNOME should start a marketing campaign of
>> "Awesome Hardware" which is known to work flawlessly, and "Sadface
>> Hardware" which is known to work, but with glitches. This can help
>> users
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 08:45 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> This is why I think GNOME should start a marketing campaign of
> "Awesome Hardware" which is known to work flawlessly, and "Sadface
> Hardware" which is known to work, but with glitches. This can help
> users make informed choices while b
hi;
On 17 April 2011 23:31, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 17-04-2011 a las 22:47 +0200, Andre Klapper escribió:
>> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> > Regarding gnome-tweak-tool, is it able to enable settings system-wide?
>> > Or, is that feature even planned for the future?
El dom, 17-04-2011 a las 22:47 +0200, Andre Klapper escribió:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Regarding gnome-tweak-tool, is it able to enable settings system-wide?
> > Or, is that feature even planned for the future?
>
> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeTweakTool
>
> andre
> > The correct use case for any electronic device is power on when using it,
> > power off when not.
> I couldn't agree any more. The default behaviour should be
> shut-down/restart.
In the suspend case there are very good reasons for not wanting the user
to think they have powered off and get a
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 12:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Regarding gnome-tweak-tool, is it able to enable settings system-wide?
> Or, is that feature even planned for the future?
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeTweakTool
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Sam Thursfield a écrit:
>
>> Suspend and hibernate are both hacks around the fact that power on and
>> power off take a long time and that our session manager doesn't save
>> session state.
>
> This seems to be an over-simplification to me
Sam Thursfield a écrit:
> Suspend and hibernate are both hacks around the fact that power on and
> power off take a long time and that our session manager doesn't save
> session state.
This seems to be an over-simplification to me. Processes managed by the
session manager are just a part of wha
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:19, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> I've been watching this discussion with increasing disappointment.
> Suspend and hibernate are both hacks around the fact that power on and
> power off take a long time and that our session manager doesn't save
> session state.
>
> Lots of pro
El dom, 17-04-2011 a las 00:13 +0200, Johannes Schmid escribió:
> Can you move that discussion to
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457
> please? Other than that, use gnome-tweak-tool to have a "Power Off..."
> option and control suspend behaviour.
>
> Thanks,
> Johannes
>
> ___
> Suspend and hibernate are both hacks around the fact that power on and
> power off take a long time and that our session manager doesn't save
> session state.
>
> The correct use case for any electronic device is power on when using it,
> power off when not.
>
I couldn't agree any more. The d
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 05:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit :
>>> Other people want it because suspend doesn't work on their hardware.
>>> Adding a configuration option is ju
Le dimanche 17 avril 2011 à 00:13 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
> Other than that, use gnome-tweak-tool to have a "Power Off..."
> option and control suspend behaviour.
The problem is not for me, I know how to change a GSettings setting. I’m
worried about our users.
I’m really not thrilled at
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 05:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit :
>> Other people want it because suspend doesn't work on their hardware.
>> Adding a configuration option is just putting wallpaper over the
>> cracked wall; the real solutio
Hi!
Am Sonntag, den 17.04.2011, 00:11 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 05:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit :
> > Other people want it because suspend doesn't work on their hardware.
> > Adding a configuration option is just putting wallpaper over the
> > cracked wall;
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 05:17 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit :
> Other people want it because suspend doesn't work on their hardware.
> Adding a configuration option is just putting wallpaper over the
> cracked wall; the real solution is to fix suspend.
I’m sorry but I don’t buy this. Suspend
On 04/14/2011 01:04 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> There's a whiteboard for that:
> https://live.gnome.org/Design/Whiteboards/SwitchGuidance
>
> Feel free to discuss it there.
Mmm... surprisingly, I fully agree with what's written in there. :-)
Is the page still under definition, or can we consider
g further comments though, I'm sure
> you'll enjoy it :)
This was one thing that surprised me with gnome 3, that all the fun
customizations was gone by default unless you install the tweak-tool.
For me it is ok, since I mostly run standard themes, but people like to
be able to change t
r the first time and it's about this new
> > version
> > of gnome 3. I was surprised: lots of changes, but I had little problem
> > about
> > all this new way of getting things done. Great work! However, the total
> > lack
> > of custom
Today, I'm writing to you for the first time and it's about this new
>> version
>>of gnome 3. I was surprised: lots of changes, but I had little problem
>> about
>>all this new way of getting things done. Great work! However, the total
>> lack
>&g
I think this discussion is more pertinent in the usability ML; I'm adding that
in CC and to the Reply-to.
On 04/14/2011 11:24 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
Today, I'm writing to you for the first time and it's about this new version
of gnome 3. I was surprised: lots of
s in the user experience, we'd love to know them so that we
can identify flaws in our designs.
Today, I'm writing to you for the first time and it's about this new version
> of gnome 3. I was surprised: lots of changes, but I had little problem about
> all this new way
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 04:19:09PM +0200, Antoine Pézier wrote:
> Today, I'm writing to you for the first time and it's about this new version
> of gnome 3. I was surprised: lots of changes, but I had little problem about
> all this new way of getting things done. Great work!
r the first time and it's about this new version
of gnome 3. I was surprised: lots of changes, but I had little problem about
all this new way of getting things done. Great work! However, the total lack
of customization is totally unacceptable to me. So sorry guys, but after all
these years, you l
> Having jumplists in the shell overlay was desired by pretty much
> everybody, though it was not specified whether they would be
> implemented as right-click menus on application icons, or something
> else.
>
> My takeaway from the session was that we would use a combination of
> static verbs (s
> My takeaway from the session was that we would use a combination of
> static verbs (specified in .desktop) and dynamic actions (specified
> using GApplication actions) to build the "action list" in an
> application's jumplist *and* in the application menu in the top panel
> of the shell. But af
Hello all,
As GNOME 3 is fast approaching we want to make sure it offers a
pleasant experience, whatever your locale. And of course we can
notice some issues, but you have so much more experience that it
would be a shame not to ask you.
If you're already running GNOME 3, great! If you&#
Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 00:04 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 00:09 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> > > As Johannes said in his email, bugzilla is the right venue.
> >
> > In defense of Sebastien, he has been proposing mock-ups, and no
Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 09:42 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:56 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> >
> > Dave Neary wrote:
> > > In defense of Sebastien, he has been proposing mock-ups, and no
> > > developers have been commenting on them there.
> >
> > ...where by "develop
Hi,
I agree (as is clear in the report) that the design is coming at the problem in
the wrong way. It seems to be the old style "there are lots of useful features
available in the back-end tools, we should have an UI for them" school of
thought. But that's not the point.
The point is that when
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
