[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005682] Re: FFE: Update webkit to 1.9.91

2012-10-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
webkit | 1.10.0-0ubuntu1 | quantal | sourc ** Changed in: webkit (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: webkit (Ubuntu R-series) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Package

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005682] Re: FFE: Update webkit to 1.9.91

2012-09-26 Thread Matthias Klose
no toolchain limitation, just a broken build system. The only way to build it is to build without -g to keep the size of the archive file below 4G. should be better fixed by building smaller archives/libraries. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, wh

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005682] Re: FFE: Update webkit to 1.9.91

2012-09-18 Thread Kate Stewart
Based on discussion in #ubuntu-release, impact of reverting from 1.9.2 to 1.8 may not be as risk free as hoped. how big is the reverse dep tree anyway? Mageia was also having trouble getting WebKit 1.9 to build 140 reverse build-deps. Not sure how far down the tree that gets one. ow and t

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005682] Re: FFE: Update webkit to 1.9.91

2012-09-18 Thread Kate Stewart
Based on the above discussion, it does not appear that this is essential for 12.10. Deferring this to R-Series, so more timely review can occur. ** Also affects: webkit (Ubuntu R-series) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: webkit (Ubuntu R-series) Status: New =>

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005682] Re: FFE: Update webkit to 1.9.91

2012-09-05 Thread Jeremy Bicha
The version of epiphany currently in Quantal works with webkit 1.8. I'm not aware of anything else depending on webkit 1.9. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to webkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005682 Title:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1005682] Re: FFE: Update webkit to 1.9.91

2012-09-05 Thread Micah Gersten
>From the security team's perspective, we'd much rather have the final webkit release in rather than an unstable snapshot to shake out any issues with the new pieces while it's still the dev release. Otherwise, we'd prefer to revert to 1.8, which would mean reverting anything that uses the new web