Quality tickets for 1.5.0

2013-04-17 Thread Christopher
Does anybody want to take another look at ACCUMULO-904 and ACCUMULO-972? It seems like a lot of those are documentation/quality issues. Not necessarily high priority stuff, but certainly nice to have better documentation. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii

Re: VFS class reloading?

2013-04-17 Thread John Vines
Tested again, reloading seems to be working fine. Unsure what was going on before. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:15 AM, John Vines wrote: > The issue wasn't that it wasn't picking up jars in there, it wasn't > dynamically loading them. I'll test again for sanity's sake. > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013

Re: VFS class reloading?

2013-04-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:43 AM, John Vines wrote: > The issue is hadoop 1.0.1 and earlier do not have commons-io at all. So > there is no jar to pick up on the classpath. So when we made commons-io > provided, we lost the jar for the previous releases. > Ah, I see. So no version variable is re

Re: VFS class reloading?

2013-04-17 Thread John Vines
The issue is hadoop 1.0.1 and earlier do not have commons-io at all. So there is no jar to pick up on the classpath. So when we made commons-io provided, we lost the jar for the previous releases. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Actually, I think I may renege for a couple

Re: VFS class reloading?

2013-04-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Actually, I think I may renege for a couple of points: > > 1) This is really a minimal change on us to support 0.20.x-based Hadoop > versions. The patch (or something similar) I made last night and then also > figuring out the correct commons-i

Re: VFS class reloading?

2013-04-17 Thread Josh Elser
Actually, I think I may renege for a couple of points: 1) This is really a minimal change on us to support 0.20.x-based Hadoop versions. The patch (or something similar) I made last night and then also figuring out the correct commons-io jar to add to that patch. 2) I re-read Dave's email and

Re: MiniAccumuloCluster backport

2013-04-17 Thread Keith Turner
Ok, thats probably why 1.5 was bumped. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Corey Nolet wrote: > Keith, > > We're using an old version of FileUtils that doesn't have the > createTempDirectory() method and we're using a version of junit that > doesn't have the TemporaryDirectory class. I could use th

Re: VFS class reloading?

2013-04-17 Thread John Vines
The issue wasn't that it wasn't picking up jars in there, it wasn't dynamically loading them. I'll test again for sanity's sake. On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM, wrote: > I was able to confirm that 'accumulo classpath' picked up jars in lib/ext. > So it's configured to know about that location.

Re: MiniAccumuloCluster backport

2013-04-17 Thread Corey Nolet
Keith, We're using an old version of FileUtils that doesn't have the createTempDirectory() method and we're using a version of junit that doesn't have the TemporaryDirectory class. I could use the system property directly or any other class that we have available but it seems the most elegant solu

Re: MiniAccumuloCluster backport

2013-04-17 Thread Keith Turner
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > Anyone against bumping the junit version in 1.4.4 to 4.11? I do not see a problem with that, but I am curious why you ask. Is there an issue you are running into? It think we went to the latest version in 1.5 because of an issue we were seei