You're right.
Initially in EasyAnt we wanted to find a way to define lifecycles. A
lifecycle is composed by a sequence of generic steps (what we've called
"phase").
Then we could play with additional script (plugins) that can be bind to a
phase.
Again the idea was to make genericity in our build s
On 2009-12-16, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> In EasyAnt there is already this notion of phase. But I see no real
> conflict with not supporting target groups in Ant. EasyAnt could just
> implement phases as targets, it would be "just" an implementation detail.
AFAIU EasyAnt uses a ProjectHelper of th
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:03:45 +0100, Jean-Louis Boudart
wrote:
> How about:
>
>
>
>
> /me run and hides!
>
> 2009/12/12 Nicolas Lalevée
>
>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:51:30 -0600, Dominique Devienne
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin
>> > wrote:
>> >> 2009/12/10 Ste
How about:
/me run and hides!
2009/12/12 Nicolas Lalevée
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:51:30 -0600, Dominique Devienne
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin
> > wrote:
> >> 2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig
> >>> and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:51:30 -0600, Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin
> wrote:
>> 2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig
>>> and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
>>> expect from the name target-*group*.
>> I also think the name target-grou
Xavier Hanin wrote:
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig
and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
expect from the name target-*group*.
I also think the name target-group is confusing for something that doesn't
provide any composition. Still I'm not sure dependencies=
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin wrote:
> 2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig
>> and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
>> expect from the name target-*group*.
> I also think the name target-group is confusing for something that doesn't
> provide any composition. [.
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig
> On 2009-12-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> [...]
>
>
> > Now thinking loud, maybe a simple attribute on target like
> > dependencies="public" would also fit ?
>
> Likely coupled with changing the current target-group name.
>
> Only thinking loudly as well we could turn
On 2009-12-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> Well, the title of this mail is referencing [1],
The short summary: it was discussed whether target-groups should be
allowed to contain tasks. I then mused whether we should do away with
target-group completely and make target's depend attribute extensibl
Well, the title of this mail is referencing [1], as announced I was thinking
that we should, but after gathering my ideas and writing this email, I am not
so sure.
So was introduced lately the concept of target group in Ant. I found it quite
interesting as it would help writing sharable ant scr
10 matches
Mail list logo
