> > I completely realize that Erik and you have helped to improve the
> > manual a lot (and not just the manual) while writing the
> book, because
> > you've used the source. It's just that 1.5.3 is a bit
> different from
> > 1.5 in some places.
> >
>
> I strongly agree. I also think the pdf d
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now,
I'm sure, too.
if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever.
Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no?
I s
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now,
I'm sure, too.
> if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever.
Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no?
> >Please note that
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Dear Mr. Gabor
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Rene Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would you have an Ant Manual in pdf that we can download? Thank you
very very much for your kindest assistance.
Unfortunately there is no PDF version of the Ant manual. Ant's manual
is currently creat
Dear Mr. Gabor
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Rene Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you have an Ant Manual in pdf that we can download? Thank you
> very very much for your kindest assistance.
Unfortunately there is no PDF version of the Ant manual. Ant's manual
is currently created from static HT
> From: Apache Software Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you
>
> not sure where to send this.. will someone get it to the right
> ant people? thanks.
>
> acked.
> --
> Th
