On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:43 -0400, Phil Stanhope wrote:
> Has there been any benchmarking done on thrift vs avro bindings in 0.7
> codebase?
No, it's kinda early for that. First priority IMO is to reach feature
parity with the thrift side, and then get comprehensive functional tests
to make sure
Thanks. The development was started in March.
Have shifted through each of the 0.6 releases with no problems so far.
The jump to 0.7 creates many opportunities. For example I have use case for
dynamic keyspaces that could result in hundreds created per quarter once in
production. I'd like to focu
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Phil Stanhope wrote:
> Has there been any benchmarking done on thrift vs avro bindings in 0.7
> codebase?
>
> If one was about to bring into alpha production in the Jan 2011 timeframe,
> would going with avro be recommended?
If you're starting dev now or soon, I
Has there been any benchmarking done on thrift vs avro bindings in 0.7
codebase?
If one was about to bring into alpha production in the Jan 2011 timeframe,
would going with avro be recommended?
If one was to benchmark ... I'd be more interested in benchmarks that
measure access to a node that act
