Folks our planned RC date is on Monday 8/19 and we have a bunch of blockers and
critical to take care of. I hope we can bring them to resolution by Monday
morning PST.
Sebastien I also need help on getting translation taken care of, Jessica and
Radhika are planning to wrap up new feature docs
Perhaps I'm reading this incorrectly. It looks like once 4.2 has completed
(which is planned for next week Monday) that we should have two months
after that before 4.3 is feature frozen.
Unless I recall incorrectly, 4.3 feature freeze is the end of next month
(about six weeks after next Monday).
>
>
> Riddle me this…
>
> I am unsure as to what the issue is, I installed CS 4.1.1 and created a
> secondary user, logged out of the Admin portion logged into the regular user
> and now the admin password does not work. How would one change the password
> via the database or another method ?
If you do 'ebtables -t nat -L -v -n', you should see the existing
rules that are created. It is something like 'only allow this ip to
come from this mac address', you can easily do an ebtables -I on the
chain (which if I remember right, the chains are named with the VM
name they apply to) for the I
security groups are managed by the agent calling
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/network/security_group.py. You
may be able to tweak that script, or call it, to have your desired
result. it IS basically just an ebtables edit.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
wrote:
>
I was mainly trying to point out that ACS has the tools to meet almost any
architectural desires, and that perhaps your selection of BASIC zone is not the
best match for what you are trying to accomplish.
It might be advantageous to build out a second zone to explore the correct
services needed
Well there are rules on the VR for sure, these are not persistent so any
alterations will break if rebooted/rebuilt < one of those. And there are rules
on the Hosts.
The VR is the first place to mess around in.
- Original Message -
From: "Maurice Lawler"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
S
I recall it being fairly simple, by adding / removing a rule from the ebtables,
so my method of thinking isn't to complex, I was hoping someone on the list
could point me in the right direction.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
wrote:
> Ok so this would make it very difficu
Ok so this would make it very difficult to achieve. With Advanced zones you
have the flexibility to make some of this stuff work. Basic was not intended
for this purpose. Advanced zone with SG enabled would give you the tools needed
to accomplish your goal.
Also if the secondary subnet is NOT f
I am not utilizing advanced, I am utilizing basic; which I know can be done,
via editing the ebtables, but I cannot recall how to do this. Yes, this
secondary subnet requires it's own gateway.
Does this extra subnet require a GW? Or is it Guest to Guest on Guests in an
Advanced ACS zone?
- Original Message -
From: "Maurice Lawler"
To: "Cloud Dev"
Cc: kel...@backbonetechnology.com
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 12:25:14 PM
Subject: Re: Easiest Way...
I understand how to add th
I understand how to add the virtual interface on the guest. However, doing so,
still does not pass traffic to that secondary IP address. Which is why I
mentioned ebtables, there is something I would need to add / remove I cannot
recall.
Also, the secondary IP's is not at all attached to Cloud
Assuming you don't care about pool sanity, then add an alias script to the
guest [ifcfg-eth0:0]
- Original Message -
From: "Maurice Lawler"
To: "Cloud Dev"
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:35:41 AM
Subject: Easiest Way...
Greetings,
What is the easiest way to manipulate a script to al
Greetings,
What is the easiest way to manipulate a script to allow a instance to get a
second IP address? I know it would require some fiddling with ebtables.
Please provide some additional information, and method to permit this please.
- Maurice
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:12 PM
To: dev
Subject: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
LS,
I see a lot of commits with only ticket numbers as commit messages.
This is not very descriptive and makes me suspicious
+1, this should be really easy to add and helps tremendously and
troubleshooting!
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:48 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
>
> Agree. The m
Tom is using devcloud, which seems having a different mount point for SR
from actual hypervisor. We are still investigating, glad to hear that your
blocker defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2583 is
verified.
-min
On 8/16/13 6:09 AM, "Sanjeev Neelarapu"
wrote:
>Tom,
>
>I
Cheers
Kish.
Ph. 6504795325
Hugo Trippaers wrote:
We’re pleased to announce the CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe!
With two very successful events in the United Stated we know it is time to
bring this conference to Europe. This time we’re gathering the community in The
Netherlands
Cheers
Kish.
Ph. 6504795325
Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote:
Tom,
I have verified Snapshot issue with Latest build. It is working fine with
Actual Hypervisor. I am not sure of dev environment.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 6:45 AM
To: de
No. Thanks. I will abort this vote.
I actually have another substantive change to make, but I didn't want to
make it along with some stylistic changes. But I don't want to tire the
list out. So I may combine them, as I am sure headers are non-controversial.
On 16 August 2013 07:44, Daan Hoogland
We’re pleased to announce the CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe!
With two very successful events in the United Stated we know it is time to
bring this conference to Europe. This time we’re gathering the community in The
Netherlands. More specific, right in the center of Amsterdam in on
Tom,
I have verified Snapshot issue with Latest build. It is working fine with
Actual Hypervisor. I am not sure of dev environment.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 6:45 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjeev Neelarapu
Subject: Re: S3
Hi Hugo,
Have a read of the log snippet in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3650
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 August 2013 10:46
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: SuichII, Christopher; ; Alex Huang
> Subject: Re
Hi Chris,
I didn't change which files had their permissions set to executable.
You should see a problem if you register a template and are using S3 secondary
storage.
You're welcome to rejig the pom.xml. Make sure that Jetty uses scripts with
their permissions set to executable.
DL
From: S
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13615/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy and Ram Ganesh.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-42
I think your virtual machines on virtualbox do not support nested
virtualization.
you can try devcloud2
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud
http://rohityadav.in/logs/devcloud/
2013/8/16 Punith s
> hi folks ,
> i have installed the CS management server 4.1 on my cento
hi folks ,
i have installed the CS management server 4.1 on my centos machine , also
i'm running the Oracle virtual box on the same machine as the hypervisor.
the CS console is coming fine , but i'm having problem in adding the host
i checked the catalina log file in managment logs ,
INFO [clo
That's interesting, Donal. I see that the scripts in
target/cloud-client-ui-4.3.0-SNAPSHOT do NOT have +x as you alluded to, however
this has never been an issue for me.
However, the scripts aren't really the issue I'm having. When the jetty target
was changed to generated-webapp, the lib/ fold
Personally, I liked the interface. One of my previous employers, an Open Source
org, employed this system for the documentation site.
If we have some mechanism in place to receive the comments in the Inbox of the
author, even more awesome !
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto
> On Aug. 13, 2013, 5:01 p.m., Murali Reddy wrote:
> > master 5cd8edd44353c756eeb6d05caaf17ed713d37f7a
> > 4.27281593758df4b5d5d110507965d3468bfd2bff4
Thanks Murali for reviewing and pushing the patch.
- Rajesh
---
This is an automa
Heya,
An easier solution could be to explicitly start the scripts with /bin/sh. No
need to set executable bits anymore, this makes a lot of stuff easier when
handling scripts.
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 aug. 2013, at 01:12, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Could yo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13614/#review25232
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On Aug. 16, 2013, 8:55 a.m., bha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13614/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4068
Reposito
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13557/#review25231
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Aug. 14, 2013, 10:29 a
34 matches
Mail list logo
