Re: [lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

2017-07-16 Thread Amey Jadiye
Thanks, I will raise PR soon, and for this we don't have to wait for 2.x , that's good part. Regards, Amey On Sun, Jul 16, 2017, 3:41 PM Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hello Amey, > > that seems to be the cleanest solution (although the one requiring the > most work). > > Cheers, > Pascal > > Am 14

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127632776 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/jpeg/segments/JfifSegmentTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +package org.apache.commons.im

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127633319 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/tiff/fieldtypes/FieldTypeByteTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +package org.apache.common

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127633025 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/pnm/PbmFileInfoTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +package org.apache.commons.imaging.forma

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127632145 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/bmp/BmpWriterRgbTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +package org.apache.commons.imaging.form

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127632387 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/bmp/BmpWriterRgbTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +package org.apache.commons.imaging.form

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127632531 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/common/bytesource/ByteSourceTest.java --- @@ -66,6 +64,22 @@ protected File createTempFile(final b

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread onealj
Github user onealj commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27#discussion_r127632941 --- Diff: src/test/java/org/apache/commons/imaging/formats/pnm/PbmFileInfoTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +package org.apache.commons.imaging.forma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC2

2017-07-16 Thread Gary Gregory
I noticed it during mvn clean verify site Gary On Jul 16, 2017 18:34, "Carl Hall" wrote: > Great feedback! Thanks so much. > > Would you please let me know how you're running PMD? I've tried `mvn > pmd:pmd`. I'm not seeing issues locally and would like to make sure the > build is bulletproo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC2

2017-07-16 Thread Carl Hall
Great feedback! Thanks so much. Would you please let me know how you're running PMD? I've tried `mvn pmd:pmd`. I'm not seeing issues locally and would like to make sure the build is bulletproof. On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1 > > From src zip: ASC, MD5, and SHA1 O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC2

2017-07-16 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 >From src zip: ASC, MD5, and SHA1 OK. RAT and CLIRR check OK. Reports look OK. Issues to address but not blockers: - PMD blows up during the build and there is no resulting PMD report. - The POM uses an old version of commons-parent. Gary On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Carl Hall wrote:

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC2

2017-07-16 Thread Carl Hall
Hi, It's been almost 3 years to the day since we've had a DbUtils release. We've fixed several important bugs and added some new features, so I would like to release DbUtils 1.7. Furthermore, we have fixed these issues for RC2, which were discovered in RC1: - resource leaks as found by FindBugs -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC1

2017-07-16 Thread Carl Hall
Thank you very much for giving this RC a keen review. Being my first release, I appreciate the help in getting this right. I'll incorporate the suggested fixes (thanks, Gary!) to the release branch and prep RC2. On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > Thank you for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC1

2017-07-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, Thank you for performing RM duties for this release. -1: This RC introduces resource leaks as found by FindBugs which are not present in 1.6: org.apache.commons.dbutils.AbstractQueryRunner BugCategoryDetailsLinePriority org.apache.commons.dbutils.AbstractQueryRunner.prepareStatement(Conn

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

2017-07-16 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: [daemon] moving to git ? and bump java version.

2017-07-16 Thread Gary Gregory
If someone here is really going to put time and energy into daemon, it would be fantastic to start with a release. It's been so long... Then fiddle away on tweaks, and release again. Gary On Jul 16, 2017 08:49, "Matt Sicker" wrote: > C quality somewhat depends on which version of C you're tryi

Re: [daemon] moving to git ? and bump java version.

2017-07-16 Thread Matt Sicker
C quality somewhat depends on which version of C you're trying to remain compatible with (I'm guessing C89 due to Windows, though I could be wrong). Valgrind and other tracing tools are typically used. I'd take a look at what OpenOffice is doing for local examples (though they have a crazy build sy

Re: [lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

2017-07-16 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hello Amey, that seems to be the cleanest solution (although the one requiring the most work). Cheers, Pascal Am 14.07.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Amey Jadiye: Hello Pascal, Thanks for putting this on table, I too think that users need some short code to show up output really quick. How about th

Re: [lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

2017-07-16 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 13.07.2017 um 22:06 schrieb Gary Gregory: Can one be pitch for entry level and the other for advanced use cases? imho yes If so, just un-deprecate but still Javadoc to [text] the user's edification. sounds good - To unsu

Re: PR Merge process lang vs text ?

2017-07-16 Thread Pascal Schumacher
As far as I know the commit is only displayed as merged on git hub if it was not altered in any way. Forhttps://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/274 I appended "( closes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.7 based on RC1

2017-07-16 Thread Amey Jadiye
Build and Tests are passing clean, clirr and rat looks good. there are few of bugs in findbug and checkstyle report but they are non-blocker to release. hashes looks good. site looks fine. Here is my +1 to release (non-binding) Checked on :- Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c074783