Re: [VOTE] Release pool 1.5.1

2009-06-14 Thread Dave Meikle
2009/6/13 Phil Steitz > Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has been fixed. > Version 1.5.1 contains a fix for this bug. > > The tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_1_RC1/ > > The release distribution files are here: > http://people.

Re: [resources] Supported Build Tools

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
2009/5/18 Niall Pemberton > I made a couple of changes since some of what was in resources pom was > duplicating what we already have in the commons-parent pom. The > compiler "properties" you set to 1.5 are used in the parent to > configure the compiler plugin. Also we tie the site and assembly

Re: [resources] Working with JIRA

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
2009/5/17 Dennis Lundberg > I've added you as a project administrator for RESOURCES in JIRA. > Thanks Dennis. Cheers, Dave

[resources] Working with JIRA

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, I was looking to go through some of the issues reported on Commons Resources in JIRA, but I don't have rights to manage the project and therefore the issues. Is this something I would be able to get access to? Cheers, Dave

Re: [resources] Supported Build Tools

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, 2009/5/17 Dave Meikle > 2009/5/17 Robert Burrell Donkin > >> i'd prefer just to maintain a maven 2 if we're looking just to maintain >> a JDK1.5+ version. >> >> jdk1.4 is now EOL'd and i don't have any particular need to support 1.

Re: [resources] Supported Build Tools

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, 2009/5/17 Robert Burrell Donkin > i'd prefer just to maintain a maven 2 if we're looking just to maintain > a JDK1.5+ version. > > jdk1.4 is now EOL'd and i don't have any particular need to support 1.4 > but i'm happy to target 1.4 if there's a need. > +1 from me - that is what I had done

Re: Reactivate Commons-Resources...?

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi Niall, 2009/5/17 Niall Pemberton > > Dave can you update your svn client config to set svn:eol-style to > native automatically when you add new artifacts - otherwise it can > cause lots of noise such as this: > > http://commons.markmail.org/message/7svz4g6ocyllsknj > > thanks > > Niall > Apo

[resources] Supported Build Tools

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, As per the previous thread on reactivating Commons Resources [0], I have moved Resources back into Sandbox and made various changes to: * Refresh the License Headers * Added a Maven2 Build * Restructured the folders in-line with the standard maven folder structure Because of the above change

Re: Reactivate Commons-Resources...?

2009-05-17 Thread Dave Meikle
2009/5/17 Henri Yandell > Karma granted to commons-sandbox. > > Which I realize doesn't cover commons/dormant, so I've changed that. > Sandbox karma lets you modify the dormant location (which should only > be to move things over into sandbox). > > First step for resources - move to sandbox. Seco

Re: Reactivate Commons-Resources...?

2009-05-16 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi Robert, 2009/5/16 Robert Burrell Donkin > opinions? > Not sure what others opinions are on this but I have projects that use the component and have been keeping them in check myself, so would be interested in this (see below). > > anyone else interested? I had previously maven-ised this

Re: [releasing] PGP keys for code signing

2009-05-08 Thread Dave Meikle
2009/5/6 Rahul Akolkar > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell > wrote: > > Much better! > > > > > [CraigRussell:~/Downloads] clr% gpg --verify > > commons-chain-1.2-bin.tar.gz.asc > > gpg: Signature made Tue May 5 22:13:09 2009 PDT using DSA key ID > 42196CA8 > > gpg: Good signatur

[COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release

2009-04-28 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, I know late last year Henri spoke about doing a 3.3 release of Collections but I assume other commitments took over - this certainly keeps happening to me just now. I see there are some new tickets that need some minor work, so was wondering what are the current plans? Apologises if I have m

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sanselan as a commons component

2009-04-26 Thread Dave Meikle
2009/4/25 Phil Steitz > > [+1] Yes! > [+0] OK > [-0 ] not thrilled about this, but OK > [-1 ] no, because... > +1 Cheers, Dave

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-16 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, 2009/3/15 Dan Fabulich > [ ] +1 release it > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because > Finally, had a chance to look at this and its a +1 from me. Cheers, Dave

Re: [exec] mvn stage:copy fails

2009-03-24 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi Siegfried, 2009/3/24 Siegfried Goeschl > [INFO] Creating zip file. > [INFO] Creating rename script. > [INFO] Uploading zip file to the target repository. > [INFO] Unpacking zip file on the target machine. > [INFO] > > [E

Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper

2009-03-14 Thread Dave Meikle
+1 2009/3/13 Stefan Bodewig > Hi all, > > since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox > components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based > on the old Jakarta template: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view

Re: Resurrecting commons-email - Was:MultiPartMail order of parts

2008-11-10 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, 2008/11/10 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > >> > >> Any hands out to help with commons-email and become a commons-email > >> maintainer? > >> > > I am willing to lend a hand. Not a committer in Commons, but an Apache committer. Cheers, Dave

Re: [functor] Revisited?

2008-04-01 Thread Dave Meikle
I would as well. Regards, Dave On 01/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would. > > -Matt > > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Generics may help breathe some new life into > > commons-functor. Would > > anyone else be interested in helping me revive it? > > >

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-03-23 Thread Dave Meikle
On 19/03/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/19/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Specifically for James Carman - how does Dave's patch to your > > COLLECTIONS-194 look? > > I would rather see it with the nopTransformer(), personally. This > would remove the

[jira] Updated: (LANG-346) Dates.round() behaves incorrectly for minutes and seconds

2007-08-02 Thread Dave Meikle (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Meikle updated LANG-346: - Attachment: LANG-346.patch Unit Test to follow as I need to shoot away to work ;-) > Dates.ro