Hello,
Are we ready for a 1.0 release of commons-numbers? Any pending updates or
blockers?
Regards,
Matt J
If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready
this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and
commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct?
-Matt J
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Matt Juntunen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are we ready
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 11:55, Matt Juntunen
wrote:
> If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready
> this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and
> commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct?
>
>
Thanks.
Definitely omit co
Le ven. 9 juil. 2021 à 12:55, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> If there aren't any objections, then I could try to get a release ready
> this weekend. I believe we are skipping the commons-numbers-arrays and
> commons-numbers-complex-streams modules for this release, correct?
No, "commons-numbers-arra
Le ven. 9 juil. 2021 à 16:21, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> [...]
> SortInPlace
>
> The latter was recently ported from Commons Math. For that class there is a
> warning about using varargs for the signature of BiConsumer double[][]>. It is using accept(double[], double[]...). I am not sure if
> this
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 09:19, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le ven. 9 juil. 2021 à 16:21, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> > [...]
> > SortInPlace
> >
> > The latter was recently ported from Commons Math. For that class there
> is a
> > warning about using varargs for the signature of BiConsumer > doub
I've removed the BiConsumer interface in NUMBERS-166. I also renamed the
"accept" method to "apply" to better indicate its active role in modifying
the arguments.
If there aren't any other changes required, I'll plan on starting the
release tonight or tomorrow sometime. To confirm, all modules wil
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 13:12, Matt Juntunen
wrote:
> I've removed the BiConsumer interface in NUMBERS-166. I also renamed the
> "accept" method to "apply" to better indicate its active role in modifying
> the arguments.
>
> If there aren't any other changes required, I'll plan on starting the
> r
Do we want to add "@since" tags to Javadocs?
-Matt J
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 9:36 AM Alex Herbert
wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 13:12, Matt Juntunen
> wrote:
>
> > I've removed the BiConsumer interface in NUMBERS-166. I also renamed the
> > "accept" method to "apply" to better indicate its ac
Le sam. 10 juil. 2021 à 18:30, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Do we want to add "@since" tags to Javadocs?
I don't think that they add much.
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comman
Since tags make sense to see what's been ADDED since 1.0.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021, 13:20 Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le sam. 10 juil. 2021 à 18:30, Matt Juntunen
> a écrit :
> >
> > Do we want to add "@since" tags to Javadocs?
>
> I don't think that they add much.
>
> Gilles
>
> -
Le sam. 10 juil. 2021 à 19:23, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Since tags make sense to see what's been ADDED since 1.0.
Well, of course. IMHO even for the additions, the tags are next to useless in
Commons components.
Gilles
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021, 13:20 Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > Le sam. 10
12 matches
Mail list logo