Re: svn commit: r1414850 - in /cxf/trunk/api/src: main/java/org/apache/cxf/io/CachedOutputStream.java test/java/org/apache/cxf/io/CachedOutputStreamTest.java

2012-11-28 Thread Aki Yoshida
Hi Dan, thanks. I switched to the right method. regards, aki 2012/11/28 Daniel Kulp : > > This likely should be BusFactory.getThreadDefaultBus() instead. Lots of > situations where the thread default is not the default. > > Dan > > > > On Nov 28, 2012, at 1:27 PM, a...@apache.org wrote: > >> Au

Re: RE: Pseudonym service and Fediz-3 (Federation)

2012-11-28 Thread Ralf Josephy
Hy, this is not a technical issue, it*s only an Austrian Issue (Prof. Dr. Wimmer Koblenz, Prof. Dr Ingeborg Zerbes), it*s more than a philosophical offer. hHow to deal with singletons. My Name is Ralf Josephy - because of the German History (Shoah) i am the only Ralf Josephy in the Interne

Re: svn commit: r1414850 - in /cxf/trunk/api/src: main/java/org/apache/cxf/io/CachedOutputStream.java test/java/org/apache/cxf/io/CachedOutputStreamTest.java

2012-11-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
This likely should be BusFactory.getThreadDefaultBus() instead. Lots of situations where the thread default is not the default. Dan On Nov 28, 2012, at 1:27 PM, a...@apache.org wrote: > Author: ay > Date: Wed Nov 28 18:27:47 2012 > New Revision: 1414850 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/view

[VOTE] buildutils and xjc-utils (take 2)

2012-11-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
To prepare for the 2.7.1 release (likely next week), I'd like to get releases of the buildutils and xjc-utils things. This second take fixes another issue of getting checkstyle configured in eclipse with the latest Checkstyle plugin. Changes: buildutils: * Remove the DoubleCheckedLogging stu

[CANCEL][VOTE] buildutils and xjc-utils

2012-11-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
I actually just discovered that the changes to the checkstyle stuff is not complete enough. While the ruleset now works, the .checkstyle file that we generate doesn't work with the latest eclipse plugin. Thus, you get checkstyle errors due to tabs in xsd files and properties files not havin

Re: Purpose of Destination/AbstractEndpoint, RMEndpoint on WS-RM

2012-11-28 Thread Aki Yoshida
hi Jesus, If you are thinking of a specific endpoint type like jaxws or jaxrs etc, you will have a specific endpoint factory to instantiate its client or server side endpoint. In contrast, the RM is configured as a feature that is enabled in the bus. So, depending on what you are intending to do, y

RE: Pseudonym service and Fediz-3 (Federation)

2012-11-28 Thread Cabrera Juan Manuel
Hie. This was to reuse the interfaces of the webservice on the client part with less efforts. But I can definitely merge this on the sts if you think it's better. Juan Manuel -Message d'origine- De : Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] Envoyé : mercredi 28 novembre 2012 13

Re: [VOTE] buildutils and xjc-utils

2012-11-28 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Christian On 11/27/2012 08:42 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > To prepare for the 2.7.1 release (likely next week), I'd like to get releases > of the buildutils and xjc-utils things. > > Changes: > buildutils: > * Remove the DoubleCheckedLogging stuff from checkstyle as the latest version > of check

Re: [VOTE] buildutils and xjc-utils

2012-11-28 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote: > +1 > > aki > > 2012/11/27 Daniel Kulp : > > > > To prepare for the 2.7.1 release (likely next week), I'd like to get > releases of the buildutils and xjc-utils things. > > > > Changes: > > buildutils: > > * Remove the DoubleChecked

Re: [VOTE] buildutils and xjc-utils

2012-11-28 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 aki 2012/11/27 Daniel Kulp : > > To prepare for the 2.7.1 release (likely next week), I'd like to get releases > of the buildutils and xjc-utils things. > > Changes: > buildutils: > * Remove the DoubleCheckedLogging stuff from checkstyle as the latest version > of checkstyle no longer suppor

Re: Pseudonym service and Fediz-3 (Federation)

2012-11-28 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Jan Manuel, Why is it necessary to create a "sts-pseudo" service? Could you not submit a patch for any new functionality that is required to the sts directly? Colm. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Cabrera Juan Manuel < juan-manuel.cabr...@atos.net> wrote: > Hello everyone. > > ** ** >