Re: Spring integration using @Configuration & @ComponentScan annotations

er (when it's really needed) using JaxWsServerFactoryBean. I'm not sure my problem is clear enough. If not I'm eager to explain in details. Best regards, Przemyslaw On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Przemysław Bielicki wrote: > I just created a jira issue: > https://issues.a

Re: Custom fault response (JAX-WS)

Hi Andrei, thanks a lot for your answer. In my case I don not care about the SOAP standard. I will try a second solution. Thx again, Przemyslaw On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > Hi, > > I see two possible cases here: > > a) If you would like to keep the standard SOAP F

Custom fault response (JAX-WS)

Hi, I spent couple of last days, debugging CXF and trying to intercept/inject custom fault response but I give up. I need your help guys. I am currently getting this kind of response when an exception is thrown (either in In or Out interceptor). http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>

Re: Spring integration using @Configuration & @ComponentScan annotations

I just created a jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5448 I hope it's clear. Cheers, Przemyslaw On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:14 PM, cschneider [via CXF] < ml-node+s547215n5737562...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > We have some factory classes but they are often not as convenient to use >

Re: Spring integration using @Configuration & @ComponentScan annotations

the annotation > processing to the CDI framework the user chooses. I have not tested how > this works with the current CXF code but I think we should try to make > it compatible with CDI. > > Does anyone have some experience with this? > > Christian > > > On 09.

Re: Spring integration using @Configuration & @ComponentScan annotations

Hi Sergey, I'm not sure CXF-5439 is a really great idea. For me all CXF components should be just annotated with @javax.inject.Named and then injected using @javax.inject.Inject or @javax.annotation.Resource. I prefer to use a well established stand

Re: Spring integration using @Configuration & @ComponentScan annotations

sure, no problem - I will file a jira issue and attach my changes as the code is not public On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:14 PM, cschneider [via CXF] < ml-node+s547215n5737562...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > We have some factory classes but they are often not as convenient to use > as the namespaces. > >