Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-10 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Sergey On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 months ago. Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from cent

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-08 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1 from me. Colm. On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming… > > Jeff > > On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss > whether we should make 2.4.10 t

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-06 Thread Jeff Genender
I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming… Jeff On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether > we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 > months ago. > > Last month, 2

[DISCUSS] 2.4.x EOL?

2012-10-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 months ago. Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, but that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't su