+1
Sergey
On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss
whether we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was
released 18 months ago.
Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from cent
+1 from me.
Colm.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming…
>
> Jeff
>
> On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss
> whether we should make 2.4.10 t
I'm all for EOLing 2.4.x and its a long time coming…
Jeff
On Oct 6, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether
> we should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18
> months ago.
>
> Last month, 2
With 2.7.0 coming out real soon (voting on now), I'd like to discuss whether we
should make 2.4.10 the last for the 2.4.x line. 2.4.0 was released 18 months
ago.
Last month, 2.4.x accounted for about 12% of the downloads from central, but
that's inline with the 11% for 2.3.x which we don't su