Hello,
I am attempting to package felix-scr-1.6.2 into Fedora [1] and would like to
request that the License be included in the release repository [2].
Does anyone have suggestions on the best way to go about getting this done?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867
[2] http://
Yeah, I agree this is a valid concern.
>From a performance point of view, we'd have to gather a few different big
test cases, but the previous changes lead to a factor 3 improvements. In
this very specific case (the BigResolutionTest), the improvement for
depth-first was an additional factory of 3
On 6/26/15 10:15 , David Bosschaert wrote:
Looks like a great piece of work, Guillaume. I left some minor
thoughts in a few places on github.
One potential concern is that the change to depth-first search will
produce different results than the previous approach.
I wouldn't worry too much ab
Looks like a great piece of work, Guillaume. I left some minor
thoughts in a few places on github.
One potential concern is that the change to depth-first search will
produce different results than the previous approach. Does it still
aim to minimise the number of class-spaces?
This might cause d
Hi Guillaume,
What a work you did !!
It looks really great !
I cloned your repo to test and take a deeper look.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 06/26/2015 03:06 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've spent the last two weeks working on optimising the resolver.
The results are available in the following gith
I've spent the last two weeks working on optimising the resolver.
The results are available in the following github fork
https://github.com/gnodet/felix/commits/FELIX-4942
The commits are split so that they can be reviewed more easily.
Most of them do not really change the algorithm in any way,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602814#comment-14602814
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-4942:
See https://github.com/gnodet/felix/commi
Guillaume Nodet created FELIX-4942:
--
Summary: Optimise the resolver
Key: FELIX-4942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4942
Project: Felix
Issue Type: New Feature
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet reassigned FELIX-4926:
--
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
> Investigate rewriting the resolver algorithm to use loops i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602808#comment-14602808
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-4871:
The logger needs to inherit the felix log
Github user acartapanis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/felix/pull/24
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexandre Cartapanis closed FELIX-4938.
---
Good correction
> Throw an exception when service use count overflow
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602694#comment-14602694
]
Alexandre Cartapanis commented on FELIX-4938:
-
Great !!
For AtomicLong, i had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602690#comment-14602690
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FELIX-4938:
---
Github user acartapanis closed the pull req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Bosschaert resolved FELIX-4938.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks! I have applied your patch. I modified it a little bit:
* I also
15 matches
Mail list logo