Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

> > As you can see in the 'constructFlexForIDE' script, the only 'adl' copied > is the Windows version: > > 156bin/adl.exe > > So, no problem on Windows. And with a known workaround for Mac. And > really, from a user's perspective, this is an edge case anyway, as Alex > explained, so let's plea

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

On 7/15/14 10:51 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Because you claim the source package should contain bin/adl. >I'm am not or never had claimed that. All I said is if you follow the >steps in the README you should get a usable SDK, currently you don't. I see, you are claiming the compiled r

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

> > How exactly is this a false alarm? If you following the instructions in > the README you end up with an SDK that is unable to compile AIR or mobile > applications. In my books that makes it a regression issue. > If you were following the instructions in the README, as you claim, you would neve

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

As you can see in the 'constructFlexForIDE' script, the only 'adl' copied is the Windows version: 156bin/adl.exe So, no problem on Windows. And with a known workaround for Mac. And really, from a user's perspective, this is an edge case anyway, as Alex explained, so let's please move on. EdB

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, > I love it how you completely ignore my proposed "solution". What do you say > about "addAIRtoSDK"? How would someone know it was a solution? And I've no idea what the situation is on windows. Justin

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Alex, > I say we ship as is. Folks can argue about how to change the README when > some user actually asks about this problem. > I agree completely. My README remark was only meant to try to get Justin to maybe change his vote - not that it's needed, but it sure would be nice. EdB -- Ix M

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC3

Not sure if you can - or should - cast a binding vote without completely testing the release. Are you just casting the -1 vote because you agree with Justin, or have you actually replicated the issue? EdB On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > I haven't been able to do

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

On 7/15/14 10:41 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >A simple addition of the need to run 'addAIRtoSDK' to the README is enough >to 'fix' this. No need for a new RC, no need for further delay. But that's only if you try to use the source package in an IDE. I built the source package, and was able to r

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Justin, I love it how you completely ignore my proposed "solution". What do you say about "addAIRtoSDK"? EdB On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Because you claim the source package should contain bin/adl. > I'm am not or never had claimed that. All I said is i

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, > Because you claim the source package should contain bin/adl. I'm am not or never had claimed that. All I said is if you follow the steps in the README you should get a usable SDK, currently you don't. > A regression from what release of Apache Flex? From 4.12.0 or 4.12.1 I believe but a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC3

+1 (binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.13.0/rc3/apache-flex-sdk- 4.13.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

A simple addition of the need to run 'addAIRtoSDK' to the README is enough to 'fix' this. No need for a new RC, no need for further delay. EdB On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Alex Harui wrote: > > On 7/15/14 10:08 PM, "Justin Mclean" > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >> Furthermore, adl is part of the AI

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

On 7/15/14 10:08 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex, >> and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the >>source >> package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building. > >Correct (and adl is n

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, > Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex, > and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the source > package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building. Correct (and adl is not in the source package) but it is required for a worki

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex, and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the source package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building. That's what these other scripts do: they copy incompatibly-licensed external stuff into

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Justin, Adl is missing because the 'constructForIDE' script doesn't copy it for the Mac. Use the 'AddAIRToSDK' script in addition to it and all is well. See my previous vote email on the subject, where I change my vote to +1. EdB On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC3

I haven't been able to do a full test on the suite -- but ADL missing is a huge -1. We are worried about small regressions that fix bugs -- we can't let something like this pass. -1 Binding -Nick On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > Package > https://dis

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

I haven't been able to do a full test on the suite -- but ADL missing is a huge -1. We are worried about small regressions that fix bugs -- we can't let something like this pass. -1 Binding -Nick On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Is it a stopper for this relea

RE: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Ideally, if the fix doesn't delay to much the release, it would be nice to have it, otherwise, there's the workaround as mention Erik: After running 'ant frameworks-rsls', ./'ide/constructFlexForIDE.sh' AND './ide/addAIRtoSDK.sh': - SDK is recognised by Flash Builder - Flash Player apps build and

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, > Is it a stopper for this release as most if not all the people use the > installer ? IMO yes - hence my vote - but other PMC members are free to vote how they like. Again if it get 3 +1 votes and more +1 than -1 that makes it a valid release. Remember you're voting on this source releas

RE: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

I also confirm adl is missing. Is it a stopper for this release as most if not all the people use the installer ? Frédéric THOMAS > Subject: Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:08:30 +1000 > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, > My understanding (from the installer vote thread) was that you were having > trouble with AIR apps after installing 4.12 and it went away after > re-starting FB. Is that not the case? The 4.13.0 RC3 source package when compiled fails to compile any AIR or mobile application as it is missi

RE: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC3

+1 (Binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.13.0/rc3/apache-flex-sdk-4.13.0-src.zip Java 1.7 OS: Windows 7 x86 6.1 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Radiate IDE 0.0.1 is now an open source project

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, jude wrote: > I received a few emails stating that making it open source is not the same > as donating it to Apache Flex which is what I wanted to do. I'm in the > process of seeing what that takes and finding out even if Apache Flex > community wants it to be par

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Radiate IDE 0.0.1 is now an open source project

I received a few emails stating that making it open source is not the same as donating it to Apache Flex which is what I wanted to do. I'm in the process of seeing what that takes and finding out even if Apache Flex community wants it to be part of the Apache Flex project at all. That would mean th

Re: Unit testing the SDK

All right, good to know. About the path - should I add a unit test called HierarchicalCollectionViewCursorTest_FLEX_34119 in sdk\frameworks\projects\advancedgrids\test\mx\collections, or is it better in sdk\frameworks\tests\mx\collections? Also, what is the whiteboard? The only things I could fin

RE: Unit testing the SDK

>I have about 80 or so FlexUnit collection tests that were in my white board to >supplement the mustella ones, but they are not currently run automatically. I also have some in my whiteboard for VectorCollection and there are the FlexUnit tests themselves in the FlexUnit repo. But no, there

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

On 7/15/14 1:41 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I think Justin's -1 is because you can't generate RSLs correctly from >>the source kit. >The RSL version number being wrong is an issue but not the major one, the >major issue os that AIR or mobile apps can't be compiled. The error >message y

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hi, > I'm running through all of the examples (using the RC code, not from the > repo). They all compile cleanly, just need to actually run each (aside > from the 4 I ran for the vote). Thanks for that - still a mystery why they fail here, it's probably a setup issue / (perhaps something missing

Re: Unit testing the SDK

Hi, > PS: searching for "[Test]" in all *.as files yields 0 results as well. I have about 80 or so FlexUnit collection tests that were in my white board to supplement the mustella ones, but they are not currently run automatically. Given that Flex Unit has been released under Apache I see no re

Re: Unit testing the SDK

TLF unit tests were written in Flex Unit 1, so you will not find in develop branch any test marked [Test], but in branch FlexUnit4TestsTLF you will find couple of tests rewritten to Flex Unit 4. I hope I will back to this soon. Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- Vie

Re: Unit testing the SDK

PS: searching for "[Test]" in all *.as files yields 0 results as well. On 15 July 2014 15:12, Mihai Chira wrote: > Thanks for that, good to know. > But I just did a global search for "flexunit" in all *.as files in > both the sdk and tlf. The only ones I could find are in > tlf\automation_core\sr

Re: Unit testing the SDK

Thanks for that, good to know. But I just did a global search for "flexunit" in all *.as files in both the sdk and tlf. The only ones I could find are in tlf\automation_core\src\UnitTest\. Does this mean I am going to write and commit the first ever unit (i.e. non-mustella) tests for the SDK? That

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

I'm running through all of the examples (using the RC code, not from the repo). They all compile cleanly, just need to actually run each (aside from the 4 I ran for the vote). The AS version of DataGrid isn't working right, but the JS version is (the multiple scrollbars are known and have been ther

Re: Unit testing the SDK

Hi, > Do I need to write mustella tests, or can I write FlexUnit ones? IMO any tests are fine and mustella test can be tricky to write if you're new to it. Justin

Re: Unit testing the SDK

Hi Mihai, You can check branch with TLF unit tests, maybe it will help you a bit. http://bit.ly/1zEX3GY Piotr - Apache Flex Committer piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-testing-the-SDK-tp39141p39143.html Sen

AW: Building Falcon with Maven

Hi Jose, having such a thing would have the major benefit hof being able to publish SNAPSHOTS of the compiler automatically. I think this would be a major breakthrough for bleeding edge developers ... simply referencing org.apache.flex.compiler:falcon-compiler:pom:4.13.0-SNAPSHOT would allow yo

Unit testing the SDK

Is there a way to write and run unit tests (e.g. FlexUnit) to test the SDK? I know we use Mustella, but from what I can tell, mustella tests need a UI / swf to run, rather than just testing a class without the need for a UI. I ask because I'd like to write some unit tests for HierarchicalCollectio

Re: Apache Flex committer invite

On 15/07/14 13:02, Mihai Chira wrote: > Is the profile still updatable via svn, then? The Wiki looks right to me. It's SVN rather than GIT because that's what the CMS uses. Tom

Re: Apache Flex committer invite

Hi all, is this[1] still valid? I can't see the folder "site" in our git repo. Is the profile still updatable via svn, then? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Updating+your+profile+on+Team+page On 14 July 2014 11:29, Mihai Chira wrote: > I've just edited that page to mentio

Re: Building Falcon with Maven

Hi Chris, Good to chat to you again, finally. I just continue the original initiative, started by Carlos Rovira in order to mavenized the falcon project from their build process. Regarding the group id name you mentioned, I don't have any problem to adopt your proposal. I'm open to get help f

Re:Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, I can compile and run the AIR desktop & mobile apps by using Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC2 with Flash Builder 4.7 I haven't tried RC3 yet, are there some major differences between RC2 & RC3? DarkStone 2014-07-15 At 2014-07-15 04:41:01, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I think Justin's -1 is becau

Re:Re: [Translation] Maybe some issue in english text

IMO, no need to change that, I've seen some other software writing the same sentence. At 2014-07-15 01:19:42, "Alex Harui" wrote: >IMO, it can be either way, but thanks for pointing that out. One could >argue that there shouldn't be a question mark at the end. > >I think I've seen lots of legal

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #218

Hi, As for me, I am testing the related java barcode generator these days. Do you have any ideas about it? Or any good suggestion? I am totally a green hand on barcode generating field. Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Re: Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 still awaiting approval

Hi, > I think Justin's -1 is because you can't generate RSLs correctly from the > source kit. The RSL version number being wrong is an issue but not the major one, the major issue os that AIR or mobile apps can't be compiled. The error message you get in in the vote thread. Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

On Jul 14, 2014 11:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > Hey Om, I agree with you. But instead of arguing this with Justin, can > you instead find the time to vote on this package? FalconJX has enough > votes. SDK 4.13.0 doesn't unless Justin changes his vote. FlexJS doesn't > unless Justin changes h

Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC5

Hey, don't forget about votes [1] from mere committers such as myself! :-) EdB 1: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flex-dev/201407.mbox/%3CCAJs%2BwW3sASPzaQT9K3PuYT3etm5SrfObaEwzEC6aS-oqQTBqHg%40mail.gmail.com%3E -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-

Building Falcon with Maven

Hi (especially) Jose, I was just informed that you are working on making falcon buildable with Maven. First of all that is great. But we should coordinate how the artifacts are called. I could see that your artifacts for the compiler are located in the groupId "org.apache.flex". You would ma

AW: Mavenizing Falcon

Wow ... ok ... didn't know he was working on making falcon buildable by maven ... but that surely would completeley eliminate the need for me to mavenize anything at all. Thanks for pointing that out ... Will write my feedback in a separate thread. Chris