Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
gt; a JavaScript grammar and Antlr4. But I would really like to start > >>working > >> on something like this AFTER finishing the migration to Maven. Otherwise > >> it's shooting on moving targets. > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> __

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Alex Harui
o crate such a generator >>using >> a JavaScript grammar and Antlr4. But I would really like to start >>working >> on something like this AFTER finishing the migration to Maven. Otherwise >> it's shooting on moving targets. >> >> Chris >> &

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
> Von: Michael Schmalle > Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 18:02 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release > FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 > > Yeah lets not get started on the whole parsing js files. :)

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
__ Von: Michael Schmalle Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 18:02 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 Yeah lets not get started on the whole parsing js files. :) What I liked about gcc is it abstracted the AST and took care

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
Yeah lets not get started on the whole parsing js files. :) What I liked about gcc is it abstracted the AST and took care of the parsing irregularities of JS. The problem is the AST walking like I did in ExternC, I had to template that as though I knew I was parsing prototypes as the extern defin

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/14/16, 8:34 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> On 3/14/16, 8:19 AM, "Michael Schmalle" >>wrote: >> >> >That said, there is only "so much" that compiler can do because I >>hacked >> >it >> >together in about a month. Thinking abou

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 3/14/16, 8:19 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > > >That said, there is only "so much" that compiler can do because I hacked > >it > >together in about a month. Thinking about a way to create something that > >can support a yriad amount o

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/14/16, 8:19 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >That said, there is only "so much" that compiler can do because I hacked >it >together in about a month. Thinking about a way to create something that >can support a yriad amount of definitions that are supported by the >current >TS community is d

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/14/16, 8:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I'm actually currently looking at the unmodified ANT build in develop. >Here I can see that the extern JavaScript stuff in GCL is checked in. The >build.xml in line contains this block: > > >failonerror="false">

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Michael Schmalle
obsolete now? > > > > > > The "js" extern directory seems to be similar, but in this case it > seems > > > that only a hand full of classes are manually added. Is this too just a > > > "monkey patch" of falsely generated code and the "src&qu

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi, I would prefer to stay in the Java world for now ;-) Chris Von: Josh Tynjala Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 16:09 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 dts2as pretty much does

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Christofer Dutz
: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 On 3/13/16, 1:08 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Thanks for the explanation :-) > >And what's actually happening in GCL? Here I can see a whole bunch of >JavaScript files as well as matching ActionScript sources. Here the &g

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-14 Thread Josh Tynjala
this case it seems > > that only a hand full of classes are manually added. Is this too just a > > "monkey patch" of falsely generated code and the "src" directory has > > precedence before the "out/as" one? > > > > Chris > > > > ___

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/13/16, 1:08 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Thanks for the explanation :-) > >And what's actually happening in GCL? Here I can see a whole bunch of >JavaScript files as well as matching ActionScript sources. Here the >out/as sort of contains the same classes as the src directory, but the >on

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Michael Schmalle
gt; Von: Josh Tynjala > Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 19:09 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release > FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 > > 1. Externs tell the Google Closure compiler which JS APIs it shouldn't > rename when optim

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
has precedence before the "out/as" one? Chris Von: Josh Tynjala Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 19:09 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 1. Externs tell the Google Closu

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
ilto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 If you need to commit stuff to the develop branch that is somewhat risky, then yes, I'll create a release branch. IMO, it would be fewer total branches and merges i

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Josh Tynjala
er itself. > > Currently I used the exec-maven-plugin for both goals, but I guess a > dedicated goal is easier to understand and makes the configuration a lot > easier. > > Chris > > > Von: Alex Harui > Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
n for both goals, but I guess a dedicated goal is easier to understand and makes the configuration a lot easier. Chris ____________________ Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 15:26 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/F

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Alex Harui
ng the artifacts individually until I find out how to >setup a common build. > >Chris > > >Von: Alex Harui >Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 06:14 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-13 Thread Christofer Dutz
d. Chris Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 06:14 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 I assume you mean "externs". There are now 8 extern swcs, and they are created with

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-12 Thread Alex Harui
f you don't >understand what's actually going on. > >Chris > > >Von: Christofer Dutz >Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2016 20:01 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 >

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
I want to replicate the behaviour in Maven, but this is hard, if you don't understand what's actually going on. Chris Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2016 20:01 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL]

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-12 Thread Alex Harui
r you? Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message-- From: Christofer Dutz Date: Sat, Mar 12, 2016 11:01 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 Well I'm currently down to 0 errors and failures

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
__ Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2016 16:09 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 On 3/12/16, 3:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >I am currently on the finishing line of preparing falcon and falcon.jx to &

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-12 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/12/16, 3:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >I am currently on the finishing line of preparing falcon and falcon.jx to >be converted to Maven. >For this I will probably need to do a few more tweaks of the testsuite, >but it's looking good. Wow! Great progress! > >When are you planning on cu

AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-12 Thread Christofer Dutz
Chris Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2016 23:41 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0 Found out what was wrong ... you have to specify the path to the FLEX_SDK sources and not a FLEX_SDK installation. I set it to my lates

AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.6.0

2016-03-11 Thread Christofer Dutz
Found out what was wrong ... you have to specify the path to the FLEX_SDK sources and not a FLEX_SDK installation. I set it to my latest FDK directory and this doesn't contain any sources it could copy. This should be checked in the build. There's just too much you can do wrong and have to find