Gav wrote:
> Can I ask,
>
> How many people are subscribed to the dev list?
> How many of those are regular posters and/or contributors?
>
> The answer is for my curiosity, but also may enlighten myself
> and others as to actually how many people are working on this project,
> it might have a
/workload.
Gav...
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Gardler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Development process and a stable trunk
| Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
| > Thanks everybody for taking the time to respond and
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Thanks everybody for taking the time to respond and giving me a change
to re-think and refine my own thoughts on these issues.
Here are some comments for a start:
- Ignoring of threads (or developments)
I'm sorry to say this but I'm simply not able to read everything
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
> We need to decide how to use Jira to create this ToDo list and then
> we need to start actually using it.
I'd concentrate on the "actually doing stuff" part (not directed to you
Ross, it's a general remark).
After having been on vacation, I now see hundreds of mails with
Thanks everybody for taking the time to respond and giving me a change
to re-think and refine my own thoughts on these issues.
Here are some comments for a start:
- Ignoring of threads (or developments)
I'm sorry to say this but I'm simply not able to read everything that's
on this list all
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 14:19 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Before you read this reply, please read again my original reply.
Did you read it, ok then go ahead and please be not offended that your
name may not be mentioned here or in the other t
On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 14:19 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > Before you read this reply, please read again my original reply.
> >
> > Did you read it, ok then go ahead and please be not offended that your
> > name may not be mentioned here or in the other thread but you
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Before you read this reply, please read again my original reply.
>
> Did you read it, ok then go ahead and please be not offended that your
> name may not be mentioned here or in the other thread but you actually
> contributed to views in any form. That is not my intent
Before you read this reply, please read again my original reply.
Did you read it, ok then go ahead and please be not offended that your
name may not be mentioned here or in the other thread but you actually
contributed to views in any form. That is not my intention. I was
focusing on code for vie
Tim Williams wrote:
On 8/27/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of my time is being taken up with general issues
for the Forrest project, so i don't often have the
time to help. I wish that other people would help more
with that stuff, applying the patches, guiding the
new develo
On 8/27/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most of my time is being taken up with general issues
> for the Forrest project, so i don't often have the
> time to help. I wish that other people would help more
> with that stuff, applying the patches, guiding the
> new developers.
What
Tim Williams wrote:
On 8/26/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
I have an uncomfortable gut feeling with the current status of our
pre-release version and I'd like your feedback on these concerns and
my suggestions to change our process.
My concerns with the
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
What I'd like to see in the future:
1 Adjust our development process so that the current development
version (I think this is called 'trunk') is always releasable,
stable and _well documented_ (meaning complete and correct, n
David Crossley wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
5 As a supportive measure, clearly mark threads in this list when they
deal with a particular branch
+1
so that people not working on that
issue can safely ignore it.
-1
All PMC members should feel responsible
On 8/26/05, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
>
> >I have an uncomfortable gut feeling with the current status of our
> >pre-release version and I'd like your feedback on these concerns and
> >my suggestions to change our process.
> >
> >
> >My concerns with the cur
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
>
> >What I'd like to see in the future:
> >
> >1 Adjust our development process so that the current development
> > version (I think this is called 'trunk') is always releasable,
> > stable and _well documented_ (meaning complete and correct, not well
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
>
> > 5 As a supportive measure, clearly mark threads in this list when they
> > deal with a particular branch
>
> +1
>
> > so that people not working on that
> > issue can safely ignore it.
>
> -1
>
> All PMC members should feel responsi
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 07:28 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> 5 As a supportive measure, clearly mark threads in this list when they
> deal with a particular branch
+1
> so that people not working on that
> issue can safely ignore it.
-1
All PMC members should feel responsible for *all* is
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
I have an uncomfortable gut feeling with the current status of our
pre-release version and I'd like your feedback on these concerns and
my suggestions to change our process.
My concerns with the current situation:
- in the last few month a number of exciting major proje
Just to sort of answer one part of this at the moment :-
>
> I have an uncomfortable gut feeling with the current status of our
> pre-release version and I'd like your feedback on these concerns and
> my suggestions to change our process.
>
> My concerns with the current situation:
>
> - in the la
I have an uncomfortable gut feeling with the current status of our
pre-release version and I'd like your feedback on these concerns and
my suggestions to change our process.
My concerns with the current situation:
- in the last few month a number of exciting major projects
(location maps, view
21 matches
Mail list logo