[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Jul 24 23:45:09 EDT 2002

2002-07-24 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/24 16:55:45 $] Release: 2.0.40 : in development. 2.0.39 : rolled June 17, 2002. 2.0.38 : rolled June 16, 2002. not released. 2.0.37 : rolled June 11, 2002. not releas

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Jul 24 23:45:05 EDT 2002

2002-07-24 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/06/27 20:57:21 $] Release: 1.3.27-dev: In development 1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002. 1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not released. 1.3.24: Tagged Mar 21, 2002. Announced Mar 22, 20

Re: Command line argument inconsistency...

2002-07-24 Thread Brad Nicholes
I decided that maybe I would take a different tac that is less intrusive on other platforms since this is a NetWare problem. If you look at os/netware/os.h you will see that we had already redefined exit() to call our pressanykey() function whenever the exit code is something other than 0.

Re: are downlevel manuals goodness?

2002-07-24 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 11:11:48PM +0100, James Cox wrote: > kick me if i got this wrong, but manual was always copied into > @@INSTDIR@@/html/manual right? Nah, we switched it to go to $(prefix)/manual by default. It's not in the htdocs dir now. -- justin

RE: are downlevel manuals goodness?

2002-07-24 Thread James Cox
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 04:58:55PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote: > > If I'm reading the Makefile correctly, current HEAD no longer > updates the > > manual/ directory if it exists, unlike 1.3. What good is a > downlevel manual? > > Yeah, that looks bogus. I'd move the copying of the manual to > in

Re: are downlevel manuals goodness?

2002-07-24 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 04:58:55PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote: > If I'm reading the Makefile correctly, current HEAD no longer updates the > manual/ directory if it exists, unlike 1.3. What good is a downlevel manual? Yeah, that looks bogus. I'd move the copying of the manual to install-man and cop

Re: Command line argument inconsistency...

2002-07-24 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:43:03PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote: > Yes. "The unix philosophy". > You are absolutely right: it IS inconsistent, and should be fixed. > But rather than changing all exit codes to 1, I would prefer to see > all these exit codes being changed to EX_OK: > #define EX_OK

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/mappers mod_negotiation.c

2002-07-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > wsanchez2002/07/24 13:47:29 > > Modified:.CHANGES >modules/dav/main mod_dav.c >modules/experimental mod_cache.c >modules/http http_protocol.c >modules/mappers mod_negotiation.c > Log:

are downlevel manuals goodness?

2002-07-24 Thread Greg Ames
If I'm reading the Makefile correctly, current HEAD no longer updates the manual/ directory if it exists, unlike 1.3. What good is a downlevel manual? Greg

Re: daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-24 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Ryan Bloom wrote: > > That is the difference between developers and users. I want the -std > files on my DEVELOPER machines, and I have tricks to get them. I don't > want them anywhere near my PRODUCTION machines, because they get in the > way. You are hardly a typical user. You shouldn't thi

Re: daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-24 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Why is that a good thing? Because it's consistent with how it works on ten million existing servers? :-) -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp

RE: HEAD is borked

2002-07-24 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 July 2002 20:58 > David Reid wrote: > > > > Who's "we"? > > > > Oh, was this more IRC related conversations? > > IRC is cool for some things, but it can inadvertently > conceal technical discussions which belong on the >

Re: HEAD is borked

2002-07-24 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
David Reid wrote: > > Who's "we"? > > Oh, was this more IRC related conversations? IRC is cool for some things, but it can inadvertently conceal technical discussions which belong on the mailing lists and in the archives thereof -- for the benefit of both posterity and those who weren't on

Re: Query: bugs 8712 and 10156/NOW 10235 as well.

2002-07-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 10156 I will plan to commit your patch in the next 24 hours. e-mail me directly if this doesn't happen. > > > 10235 > > What is the exact failure with --enable-mods-shared=all? Are the > > modules built? Do they load? > > I thought I includ

Re: atol

2002-07-24 Thread Thom May
* Wilfredo Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > There are several places in HTTPD where we use atol to parse ranges from > HTTP headers. Problem (at least on Darwin) is that a long is smaller > than size_t, and we're unable to handle large files in the 2-4GB range. > > atol is the sam

Re: Query: bugs 8712 and 10156/NOW 10235 as well.

2002-07-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:30, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Can anyone tell me what I need to provide to get these 3 bugs looked at: > > > > 8712 > > need to modify apxs to add LoadModule/AddModule outside of > > I thought somebody commented on this gen

Re: Query: bugs 8712 and 10156/NOW 10235 as well.

2002-07-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can anyone tell me what I need to provide to get these 3 bugs looked at: > > 8712 need to modify apxs to add LoadModule/AddModule outside of I thought somebody commented on this general problem recently. My guess is that there won't be a lot of de

Re: mysqlsupport for virtuals.

2002-07-24 Thread Jonas Eriksson
I wait for it.. / Jonas > Hi Jonas, > > i'm actually workin on hacking a module for this. (ie, like mod_vhost_alias, > but uses a db) > > give me maybe a few weeks and i'll publish.. > > -- james > > > > > Hi > > > > My http.conf file grows every day and its getting big... > > It's get

Re: atol

2002-07-24 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:45:40AM -0400, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote: > 1- Is adding apr_strtoll kosher? +1. > 2- Should I also add apr_strtoll for completeness? +1. -- justin

RE: mysqlsupport for virtuals.

2002-07-24 Thread john
Even Better: lets just make the whole damn configuration interface pluggable (yup, this has been suggested since the dinosaurs.). We're on the right track now that the config file is parsed at startup time sterling >-- Original Message -- >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: "Jonas Erik

RE: mysqlsupport for virtuals.

2002-07-24 Thread James Cox
Hi Jonas, i'm actually workin on hacking a module for this. (ie, like mod_vhost_alias, but uses a db) give me maybe a few weeks and i'll publish.. -- james > > Hi > > My http.conf file grows every day and its getting big... > It's getting hard to find anyting without seartching in it. > > My

mysqlsupport for virtuals.

2002-07-24 Thread Jonas Eriksson
Hi My http.conf file grows every day and its getting big... It's getting hard to find anyting without seartching in it. My question is : I like to move all virtualshosts away from httpd.conf in to a mysql server. My doing that it would be muth easy to maintain my virtualhosts. Have someone tri

Re: [VOTE] httpd-std.conf WAS: RE: daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-24 Thread Greg Ames
Sander Striker wrote: > Exactly, why should users that keep their config dir clean have to pay when > some users don't want to be troubled with getting httpd-std.conf from elsewhere > and need it installed at their fingertips? Getting the defaults from elsewhere doesn't bother me if the dir has

Re: [Win32] Compiling error missing apr-iconv.h

2002-07-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heckel) writes: > > cvs login: failed to open c:/.cvspass for reading: No such file or > > directory > > > Hi, > I solved this problem:-) > I created an empty file .cvspass on c:\ and now I could download all > apr-iconv files. cool... I hit that cvs bug before too

atol

2002-07-24 Thread Wilfredo Sanchez
There are several places in HTTPD where we use atol to parse ranges from HTTP headers. Problem (at least on Darwin) is that a long is smaller than size_t, and we're unable to handle large files in the 2-4GB range. atol is the same as calling strtol with NULL and 10 as the last to args, a

Re: [VOTE] httpd-std.conf WAS: RE: daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-24 Thread johannes m. richter
>Secondly consider that you have installed 2.0.35 and are upgrading to 2.0.40. >If ${sysconfdir}/[examples/]httpd-std.conf would be overwritten, you would >have >no chance to compare the old httpd-std.conf with the new httpd-std.conf >anymore. >I consider that diff more usefull than the diff be

Support for win9x. What is required? Request for information.

2002-07-24 Thread Russell Jones
I would like to roll out some software to users based on apache2 under windows 98 (and other windows +platforms). When visiting http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/platform/windows.html I see a severe sounding message +stating that support for windows 98 is incomplete. What determines if the supp

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2002-07-24 Thread Thom May
* Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * James Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > no! no! leave apachectl to behave as it always has done. could someone > > > consider vetoing this argument based on backwards compatibility? > > > > > > -- Jame

Re: Envariables for logging phase only

2002-07-24 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Joshua Slive wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > > I personally find that a bit baroque. :-) Also, it's tied > > specifically to mod_log_config. However, you've given me > > an idea, so here's a counterproposal: > > > > LogStatus envname[=val] statusre ... > > (

[VOTE] httpd-std.conf WAS: RE: daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-24 Thread Sander Striker
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick > Sent: 23 July 2002 19:30 [...] > I'm curious about how other people feel about this, so I started a > vote in STATUS. * httpd-std.conf and friends a) httpd-std.conf should be tailored by install (from sr

Re: apache freebsd port --enable-so

2002-07-24 Thread Tony Finch
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:43:54PM +0100, Dev Zero G Ltd wrote: > How can I make "make" compile/configure/make apache 2 with the > --enable-so option? I can not run ./configure since I already have a > Makefile. If you are using the FreeBSD port then it does --enable-so by default. Tony. -- f