Re: Seg fault in mod_dav.

2002-09-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 07:47:14PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > Okay... I've checked in the change. I'd suggest tossing 2.0.41 and roll this > fix into a 2.0.42. (I'm not suggesting using HEAD for 2.0.42) > > Something like: > > $ cvs tag -r APACHE_2_0_41 APACHE_2_0_42 # copy the tag > $ cvs tag

ForceLanguagePriority in Apache 1.3

2002-09-18 Thread David Burry
By the way, I love the idea of backporting the Apache 2.0 ForceLanguagePriority into Apache 1.3... This directive completely solves a looot of problems I've been having with stupid non-standards-conformant IE and content negotation. Many thanks to whoever posted the patch. If only it were possi

[PATCH]: mod_log_config.c: FOR YOUR EYES ONLY :-)

2002-09-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
I didn't even compile this baby, let alone test it, but I wanted to check with everyone if I'm finally moving in the right direction with this. Bojan PS. This is along the lines of what Ryan suggested, or at least I hope it is ;-) - This mail sent

[PATCH] DAV method registration

2002-09-18 Thread Ryan Morgan
This patch moves all the DAV method registration into the mod_dav module from the http core. I'd like to do this for a couple reasons: 1) It makes more sense to register these methods from the same module they are used in. 2) Since Apache can only handle 62 registered methods, it doesn't ma

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Sep 18 23:45:14 EDT 2002

2002-09-18 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/09/17 07:02:16 $] Release: 2.0.42 : in development. 2.0.41 : rolled September 16, 2002. 2.0.40 : released August 9, 2002 as GA. 2.0.39 : released June 17, 2002 as GA.

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Sep 18 23:45:08 EDT 2002

2002-09-18 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/09/18 15:36:26 $] Release: 1.3.27-dev: In development. Jim proposes a t/r on or around Sept 24. 1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002. 1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not relea

Re: Seg fault in mod_dav.

2002-09-18 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 07:31:27PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: >... > Oh... wait a sec. I was getting too complicated. Simply sending an OPTIONS > request *with a body* to a location using mod_dav_fs as its provider will > blow up at that point. Well, mod_dav_FOO that doesn't provide versioning > sup

Re: Seg fault in mod_dav.

2002-09-18 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 07:37:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... > First, a stack trace: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 18642)] > 0x403cf42f in dav_method_options (r=0x8123470) at mod_dav.c:1762 > 1762if ((err = (*v

Re: Problems checking out new module from newly setup SVN server

2002-09-18 Thread Jeff Stuart
Well, I found my problem... APPARENTLY, SVN doesn't like the worker MPM... This is with Apache 2.0.41. I'm ccing httpd-dev in case it's an apache problem and not a svn problem. Note, even when I did an OPTIONS on /svn, it would freeze for a good 2 minutes or so. The backtrace I got when I

Re: Seg fault in mod_dav.

2002-09-18 Thread rbb
More details. YAY First, a stack trace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 18642)] 0x403cf42f in dav_method_options (r=0x8123470) at mod_dav.c:1762 1762if ((err = (*vsn_hooks->get_option)(resource, elem, &body)) (gdb) where

Re: Seg fault in mod_dav.

2002-09-18 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:49:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't know if this is in .41 because I haven't had time to test it > yet. But, HEAD of mod_dav has an annoying seg fault. Basically, if you > send an OPTIONS request for a location that isn't configured for DAV, the > modu

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 09:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > yep, requests are always logged in order. Thanks. Back to the code :-) Bojan

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread rbb
On 19 Sep 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 07:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Great, now one more change. :-) > > > > Don't add the fields to the structure. The conn_Rec has a vector for > > modules to add data to. Create a log_config structure, and add the fields > > th

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 07:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Great, now one more change. :-) > > Don't add the fields to the structure. The conn_Rec has a vector for > modules to add data to. Create a log_config structure, and add the fields > there. This allows the core structures to remain as t

Seg fault in mod_dav.

2002-09-18 Thread rbb
I don't know if this is in .41 because I haven't had time to test it yet. But, HEAD of mod_dav has an annoying seg fault. Basically, if you send an OPTIONS request for a location that isn't configured for DAV, the module seg faults. I have traced it far enough to know where it is happening, bu

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread rbb
On 19 Sep 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 00:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The easiest way, would be to put the filters in mod_log_config, and have > > that module save the information in a connection_rec vector. > > OK, I think I roughly understand what is the plan: >

Re: [PATCH] make test TEST_VERBOSE=1

2002-09-18 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > I think the attached patch behaves as suggested. > > perfectly, thanks. with 5.8.0 that is. with 5.6.1, dies with: Error in option spec: "verbose:1" -

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 00:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The easiest way, would be to put the filters in mod_log_config, and have > that module save the information in a connection_rec vector. OK, I think I roughly understand what is the plan: - introduce c->bytes_in and c->bytes_out (c is conn_

Re: [PATCH] make test TEST_VERBOSE=1

2002-09-18 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote: > I think the attached patch behaves as suggested. perfectly, thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

multibyte characters in server root directory (and other I18N issues)

2002-09-18 Thread Title, Richard
As a bit of background, I am incorporating a somewhat customized version of Apache 2.0.x into a software product here. Our product installer allows the user to specify an install-to directory. On foreign-language systems (e.g. Japanese) this could be a directory name with multibyte characters in i

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread rbb
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > The problem is that the filters aren't HTTP specific. If you make this > > change, then the filters will be written to take advantage of the f->r > > field in connection level filters. Since that field doesn't make se

Code navigation

2002-09-18 Thread Magen, Carmel
Hi! I'm new to the Apache and don't find my way in the code. I'm looking for the methods Apache uses to handle many multiple parallel requests. Can you point me in which module or file I should look for that? TIA Carmel Magen

Re: [PATCH]: Update request in connection based filters

2002-09-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
There is another possibility to fix this, and that's within the module itself (I've tested it and it works): -- static void logio_create_req(request_rec *r) { ap_filter_t *f; conn_rec *c = r->connection; /* Tie connection filters with r

Apache 2.0 OpenSSL error

2002-09-18 Thread Estrade Matthieu
Hi, for few days, i am stressing my apache 2.0.40 with reverse proxy with a tools named Silkperformer. i have a really strange error, coming up often on some basic requests: the request is http://web2.test.com/manual/images/pixel.gif [Wed Sep 18 12:24:04 2002] [error] SSL error on reading data

WWW-Authenticate header lost when reverse-proxying chunked response

2002-09-18 Thread rreiner
The WWW-Authenticate header is being dropped from responses sent by mod_proxy in reverse proxy mode, when the original server's response was chunked. The problem appears to be in ap_http_header_filter() in modules/http/http_protocol.c, where we have: if (r->status == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED) {

FW: pcre in aprutil

2002-09-18 Thread Sander Striker
[Forwarded to dev@httpd as this would affect httpd aswell] -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 September 2002 13:00 To: apr Cc: Mladen Turk Subject: pcre in aprutil Hi, We would like to use the pcre of httpd-2.0/srclib/pcre in mod_jk2 (Jakar

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/build httpd_roll_release

2002-09-18 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:41PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > striker 2002/09/17 11:43:41 > > Modified:buildhttpd_roll_release > Log: > Fixup the timestamp on modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.c after running > buildconf when we roll a release. > The same has to be done for

Re: (forw) [dfries@mail.win.org: Bug#161253: apache2: shared memorycleanup]

2002-09-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 19:24, Thom May wrote: > Shared memory (as used by at least the ssl module) needs to rethink > how they go about cleaning it up. Currently kill -9 the apache > processes or it would appear that even /etc/init.d/apache2 reload will > cause apache to fail to start because the

Re: (forw) [dfries@mail.win.org: Bug#161253: apache2: shared memory cleanup]

2002-09-18 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:24:43AM +0100, Thom May wrote: >... > please can the cc line ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be maintained so the bug > gets a record of this? Well, dunno about that. Since this list obeys Ken's nefarious insistence on Reply-To munging, who knows what'll happen when people reply?

(forw) [dfries@mail.win.org: Bug#161253: apache2: shared memory cleanup]

2002-09-18 Thread Thom May
I'm forwarding this debian bug onto the dev list for discussion and comments. please can the cc line ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) be maintained so the bug gets a record of this? Cheers, -Thom -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < robster> SHIT < robster> woody doesnt support devfs < willy> devfs is FUcking