On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-82 is resolved and fixed in
trunk. Are you sure you didn't interchange the two issues ?
Cool, I'm reading my mail serially.
Grisha
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I can't for the life of me figure out where cgi.t is generated from as
its not under SVN.
Call me an idiot, I was lookin in the rc3 dir not the svn dir. *sigh*
Here's a patch:
svn diff
Index: cgi.t
===
On 10/20/05, artem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All.
When I'm building my own module (using mod_cplusplus) string LoadCPPHandler in
httpd.conf causing
/etc/init.d/apachectl: line 89: 13955 Segmentation fault $HTTPD -k $ARGV,
but when i'm writing it in mod_cplusplus dir using it's own MakeFile
Hello guys,
I'm trying to build a binary distribution of Apache 2.0.54 for HPUX 32bits.
I can build the binaries, and the tar.gz distrib file, but I can not
deploy it on other servers, since my httpd binary doesn't seem to be
properly linked.
I build the distrib with the following command
On 10/21/05, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build a binary distribution of Apache 2.0.54 for HPUX 32bits.
I can build the binaries, and the tar.gz distrib file, but I can not
deploy it on other servers, since my httpd binary doesn't seem to be
properly linked.
I build the
On 10/19/2005 08:25 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..cut..]
Researching as well.
Any new results from your research? Otherwise I would like to commit the latest
version
of my patch to trunk if you have no objections.
Regards
Rüdiger
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Sorry, maybe I am only confused, but I think I disagree with you on that.
The proxy code is reading the input filter chain in a loop and does repeated
calls to ap_get_brigade without doing any more things with these brigades
it
On 10/21/2005 04:06 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
[..cut..]
I agree that's the correct analysis, your patch to fix the proxy to use
ap_save_brigade looks good to me.
Thanks for feedback. I will commit later to give otherBill a chance for
feedback.
One technical question: As this bug was reported
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Anyway, I have attached an updated version of my log handler. This fixes
the issue with log levels that don't exactly map to any defined level.
Eliminates the explicit stack for storing request objects and in general
tries to make the module durable in the face of any
On 10/19/05, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/2005 10:44 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..cut..]
The problem is -not- in creating the transient buckets (if they are
sent, that's
goodness). The problem is in transforming them to persistant buckets
before the
On 10/21/05, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/2005 04:06 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
[..cut..]
I agree that's the correct analysis, your patch to fix the proxy to use
ap_save_brigade looks good to me.
Thanks for feedback. I will commit later to give otherBill a chance for
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/21/2005 04:06 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
[..cut..]
I agree that's the correct analysis, your patch to fix the proxy to use
ap_save_brigade looks good to me.
Thanks for feedback. I will commit later to give otherBill a chance for
feedback.
Just got a
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/19/2005 08:25 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..cut..]
Researching as well.
Any new results from your research? Otherwise I would like to commit the latest
version
of my patch to trunk if you have no objections.
Yes ... and from the breadth of your other
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/21/2005 04:06 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
[..cut..]
I agree that's the correct analysis, your patch to fix the proxy to use
ap_save_brigade looks good to me.
Thanks for feedback. I will commit later to give otherBill a chance for
feedback.
One technical question: As
Hi,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-82 is resolved and fixed
in trunk. Are you sure you didn't interchange the two issues ?
Regards,
Nicolas2005/10/21, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can we do a release of 3.2.2-final or do we need another beta to fixissues related to platforms
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-82 is resolved and fixed
in trunk. Are you sure you didn't interchange the two issues ?
You are correct sir.
That doesn't change my main point though. Do we need to go through
another beta round so people can test
I can try to integrate Graham's proposal for a fix to MODPYTHON-83 and
test it on Win32 this week-end, but after that I'll be away for a week.
Regards,
Nicolas2005/10/21, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-82 is resolved and
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I use some hacks for binbuild-like binary distributions on HP-UX:
a) add -Wl,+s for SHLIB_PATH (you tried that)
It works nicely if you tweak libtool's archive_cmds from +b to +s +b
in the hpux* section of acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4 and configure, also
toggling...
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
It is only recently that I realised that a nested function like that
could access stack variables of the enclosing function.
I should have added, when the execution of the enclosing function has
already finished and the nested function is
On 10/21/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I use some hacks for binbuild-like binary distributions on HP-UX:
a) add -Wl,+s for SHLIB_PATH (you tried that)
It works nicely if you tweak libtool's archive_cmds from +b to +s +b
in the hpux* section of
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
I can try to integrate Graham's proposal for a fix to MODPYTHON-83 and
test it on Win32 this week-end, but after that I'll be away for a week.
If you have a chance could you test req.sendfile() on Windows as well?
See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-84
--On October 21, 2005 4:29:36 PM +0200 Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
like to propose this patch for backport. As I am only committer am I
allowed
- to add it to the 2.0.x STATUS file
- add my (of course non binding) vote on this backport?
FWIW, your vote *is* binding and counts
Jim Gallacher wrote:
I'm wondering where the PythonLogHandler directive might fit into the
scheme of things. One problem of course is that any PythonLogHandler
gets called *after* any PythonHandlers.
I believe the PythonLogHandler is used to intercept and handle logging in
apache itself.
Nick wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
I'm wondering where the PythonLogHandler directive might fit into the
scheme of things. One problem of course is that any PythonLogHandler
gets called *after* any PythonHandlers.
I believe the PythonLogHandler is used to intercept and handle logging
in
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
It is only recently that I realised that a nested function like that
could access stack variables of the enclosing function.
I should have added, when the execution of the enclosing function has
already finished and the nested function is
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-21 15:01:04]:
By the way, if someone has a chance to update mod_mbox on ajax, that
would be great. We just hit load average of 100 before I bounced httpd
to clear out all the never-ending mod_mbox requests.
Sorry, I don't have neither the level of
support/logresolve doesn't support IPv6 addresses, which is a pain,
because while logresolve is not a brilliant log resolver, it's useful
for putting at the end of brief command lines, grepping things and so
on.
Anyway;
http://people.apache.org/~colm/logresolve.c
is an APR version,
On 10/21/2005 08:34 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On October 21, 2005 4:29:36 PM +0200 Ruediger Pluem
- add my (of course non binding) vote on this backport?
FWIW, your vote *is* binding and counts towards quorum. -- justin
Sorry, but I am confused. I thought only PMC members have
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Grisha,
I had the status of these issues flipped in my original message. The cache
problem MODPYTHON-82 *is fixed* in trunk. MODPYTHON-83 (compile problems when
python is not threaded, for example on BSD) is not fixed.
Hmm... 83 seems to be about
On 10/21/2005 07:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
We might be better off using this fix (and documenting the usage of all get
brigade calls w.r.t. transient buckets), while in 2.0.x we might want to
return an allocated bucket in mod_ssl to ensure third party 2.0
--On October 21, 2005 11:34:47 PM +0200 Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry, but I am confused. I thought only PMC members have binding votes.
Or is my vote binding because I proposed the backport?
Since you have commit access to httpd, the intent is for you to be able to
vote on
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:48:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Fri Oct 21 15:48:18 2005
New Revision: 327601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=327601view=rev
Log:
* Move two backports from proposed to accepted, as they have enough votes now.
I don't think
On 10/22/2005 12:59 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:48:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Fri Oct 21 15:48:18 2005
New Revision: 327601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=327601view=rev
Log:
* Move two backports from proposed to accepted, as
On 10/21/05, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:48:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Fri Oct 21 15:48:18 2005
New Revision: 327601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=327601view=rev
Log:
* Move two backports from proposed
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 07:40:04PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I don't think this should be done until the actual code is backported
too :-) (someone more clued-in than I can confirm though).
Move from proposed to accepted when there are sufficient votes.
Remove from STATUS when code is
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/21/2005 08:34 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On October 21, 2005 4:29:36 PM +0200 Ruediger Pluem
- add my (of course non binding) vote on this backport?
FWIW, your vote *is* binding and counts towards quorum. -- justin
Sorry, but I am confused.
On Oct 21, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-21 15:01:04]:
By the way, if someone has a chance to update mod_mbox on ajax, that
would be great. We just hit load average of 100 before I bounced
httpd
to clear out all the never-ending
37 matches
Mail list logo
