On 02/03/2009 12:20 AM, l...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lars
> Date: Mon Feb 2 23:20:37 2009
> New Revision: 740149
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=740149&view=rev
> Log:
> mod_deflate: Fix creation of invalid Etag headers. We now make sure
> that the Etag value is properly quoted wh
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group"
wrote:
> Please open reports in Bugzilla for every single problem you found and
> attach the patch that fixes this single problem to it.
Ok, no problem. And sorry for the noise ! :)
--
Kevin Deldycke
• blog: http://kevin.deldycke.com
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Kevin Deldycke
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 16:14
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Contributing to httpd's RPMs ?
>
> Hi !
>
> I'm currently using httpd 2.2.x on a RHEL 4 and maintaining a custom
> RPM for my customer. As such, I came a
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Eric Covener
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2009 16:11
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: ProxyErrorOverride inside location
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Nick Gearls
> wrote:
> > The development was actually done in 2.2.
> > I do not
I understand now.
What about 2.3 ?
To be honest, I really cannot imagine another module using that value,
even in 2.2. But we have to be strict, I agree.
Does the code satisfies everybody, or should I rework it in any way ?
Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Nick Gearls wro
Hi !
I'm currently using httpd 2.2.x on a RHEL 4 and maintaining a custom
RPM for my customer. As such, I came across some annoyances regarding
the .spec file. Many (if not all) of these are really minor problems
like code layout, code duplication, misconfiguration and so on. As you
can see, not "
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Nick Gearls wrote:
> The development was actually done in 2.2.
> I do not see any difference between 2.2 & 2.3 regarding this.
Since the per-server config appears in a public header, it's fair game
that other modules have a reference to it. They wouldn't expect th
Hello *,
I am trying to send data from server to the client side and all works
fine.
Wireshark with SSL shows me that data which I've sent has been really
sent.
But problem is that I used to following functions for sending data in my
handler (in register hook function ap_hook_handler)
r->co
The development was actually done in 2.2.
I do not see any difference between 2.2 & 2.3 regarding this.
Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Nick Gearls wrote:
A patch is submitted:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656
Here are the modifs:
- added |ACCESS_C
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Nick Gearls wrote:
> A patch is submitted:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656
>
> Here are the modifs:
> - added |ACCESS_CONF to AP_INIT_FLAG
> - error_override & error_override_set are moved to proxy_dir_conf
> - set_proxy_error_override() i
A patch is submitted:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656
Here are the modifs:
- added |ACCESS_CONF to AP_INIT_FLAG
- error_override & error_override_set are moved to proxy_dir_conf
- set_proxy_error_override() is modified to use provided dconf*
As I explained, this is very
11 matches
Mail list logo