On 09/17/2011 06:25 PM, drugg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Sat Sep 17 16:25:17 2011
> New Revision: 1172010
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1172010&view=rev
> Log:
> Log better information and prevent leak of an X509 structure for
> SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFi
On 19.09.2011 01:37, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
>>>
>>> Not sure about socache, but docs are definitely needed, because you need
>>> socache for mod_ssl
On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>>
>>>- mod_socache_dbm
>>>- mod_socache_memcache
>>>- mod_socache_shmcb
>>
>> Not sure about socache, but docs are definitely needed, because you need
>> socache for mod_ssl session cache (which we also need to mention int t
The CookieLog directive has been documented as deprecated since mod_log_config
was introduced, back in the 1.2 days. Any objection to axing it?
Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml
===
--- docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:52:34 +0200
Rainer Jung wrote:
> > - mod_socache_dbm
> > - mod_socache_memcache
> > - mod_socache_shmcb
>
> Not sure about socache, but docs are definitely needed, because you need
> socache for mod_ssl session cache (which we also need to mention
On 19.09.2011 00:17, Rich Bowen wrote:
> My current list is:
>
> - mod_serf
mod_serf likely to get dropped for 2.4, see our main STATUS file
> - mod_watchdog
Mainly written by Mladen, so maybe he can provide a few pointers
> - mod_heartbeat
> - mod_heartmonitor
On Sep 18, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
>>>
>>> The only 2 showstoppers I see as "reasonable" are the
>>> documentatio
On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
>>
>> The only 2 showstoppers I see as "reasonable" are the
>> documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one.
>
> Could you enumerate what you f
On Sep 18, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.34
ignore… sorry :)
On 18 Sep 2011, at 7:36 AM, Bill Lipa wrote:
According to this thread on serverfault:
http://serverfault.com/questions/74025/apaches-mod-cache-not-caching-fcgi-php-output
and this dormant bug:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48364
the use of Action directives to handle php req
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.34 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.34 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_34 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
> I think the windows accept filter issue is a real blocker. The only
> alternative would be to release 2.4.0 without official support for
> Windows.
I took a look at this in the AM, and it looks like the acceptfilter
none path is relying on data set only by AcceptEX (context->buffer) to
fill in c
On Sunday 18 September 2011, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> |cause mod_aut| 22005|Ver|Nor|2003-07-30|Win32: "Help I'm Stuck!" menu item
> leads to dead e|
"Ver" == status verified, which means the reporter has verified
that a resolved bug is actually fixed. Can we omit PRs with
that status from th
On Sunday 18 September 2011, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:56 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > In the documentation for the ErrorLogFormat directive, log format
> > strings are given as, for example, %...A
> >
> > What does the ... signify?
> >
> > It's not clear to me either from the doc (
14 matches
Mail list logo
