On 10/19/2015 07:44 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
This is the deferred write triggering *after* the keepalive timeout,
whereas no subsequent request was pipelined.
I wonder if we shouldn't issue a flush at the end of each request when
the followin
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> This is the deferred write triggering *after* the keepalive timeout,
> whereas no subsequent request was pipelined.
> I wonder if we shouldn't issue a flush at the end of each request when
> the following is not already there, ie:
Can you desc
On 10/19/2015 06:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
[From users@]
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
The issue is currently reproduced using Apache httpd 2.4.16, mod_jk 1.2.41
and tomcat 8.0.28.
I've created a very very simple JSP page that does nothing but print a small
string, but
[From users@]
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
>
> The issue is currently reproduced using Apache httpd 2.4.16, mod_jk 1.2.41
> and tomcat 8.0.28.
>
> I've created a very very simple JSP page that does nothing but print a small
> string, but I've tried changing the jsp page to p
[Meant for dev@...]
Thoughts?
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58503
>
> --- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic ---
> (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #7)
>> Actually I think mod_proxy_wstunnel falls into the same pitfall
>> mod_proxy_http was in and it needs to do the same / so
Hi Jacob,
[CCing dev@, probably more insight about this from there]
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> The patchset I recently folded into mod_websocket [1] rails the CPU when
> using ws:// instead of wss://. The problem appears to be that an empty
> non-blocking read from
Hello Apache gurus.
I was working on a project which used Apache 2.2.x with prefork MPM (using
flock as mutex method) on Linux machine (with 20 cores), and run into the
following problem.
During load, when number of Apache child processes get beyond some point (~3000
processes) - Apache didn't
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:39:06 +0200
Graham Leggett wrote:
> > Note, mod_transform is GPL. Originally my decision when I released
> > its earlier predecessor, before I was part of the dev@httpd team.
> > I'd be happy to re-license it as Apache, and I don't think
> > any of my co-developers would o
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:39:06PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2015, at 3:20 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > There are several old modules: for example mod_transform.
> > I expect they still serve for sites without i18n requirements.
> > One option would be to overhaul that.
> >
> > Note,
On 19 Oct 2015, at 3:20 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> There are several old modules: for example mod_transform.
> I expect they still serve for sites without i18n requirements.
> One option would be to overhaul that.
>
> Note, mod_transform is GPL. Originally my decision when I released
> its earlier p
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 13:49 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the light of the move to simple services that talk XML/JSON and HTML and
> Javascript based clients that become more and more capable, I find myself
> wanting an XSLT filter quite often these days to sit in the middle and
Hi all,
In the light of the move to simple services that talk XML/JSON and HTML and
Javascript based clients that become more and more capable, I find myself
wanting an XSLT filter quite often these days to sit in the middle and
translate between the two.
As a complement to mod_xmlenc, would i
12 matches
Mail list logo