Re: TIL

2016-04-26 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 26.04.2016 um 23:57 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> Today I Learned the difference between writing >> DATA + META >> and >> DATA + META + FLUSH >> to the core output filters. I am

Re: svn commit: r1739876 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-26 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 27.04.2016 um 03:53 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > > My gut instinct is to propose scoreboard.c for a full svn revert back > to a working state, I did not realize that it is that deep of a mess now. Please revert, uncomment the new calls use in http2 and I'll find

Re: svn commit: r1739876 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-26 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr > > wrote: > >> > >> Reviewing the applicable patch, the

Re: Recent updates to httpd-trunk

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
Thanks, done in r1741112 and r1741115. Regards, Yann.

Recent updates to httpd-trunk

2016-04-26 Thread NormW
G/M from a very warm autumn. 1. Could someone please: - set the correct EOL type in svn for .\modules\http2\NWGNUproxyht2, - Patch as per the following to allow builds of \http2 and \ssl D:\Projects\svn\httpd-trunk>svn diff Index: modules/http2/NWGNUmod_http2

Re: svn commit: r1739876 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:48 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> >> Reviewing the applicable patch, the client, request and protocol now >> appear > > > ... the client, vhost and protocol now

Re: TIL

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Today I Learned the difference between writing > DATA + META > and > DATA + META + FLUSH > to the core output filters. I am astonished that > my code ever worked. > > Seriously, what is the reason for this

Re: svn commit: r1739876 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-26 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Reviewing the applicable patch, the client, request and protocol now appear > ... the client, vhost and protocol now appear ... > to persist for idle connections, but the request is still NULL? > > Is this by

Re: svn commit: r1739876 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2016-04-26 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Reviewing the applicable patch, the client, request and protocol now appear to persist for idle connections, but the request is still NULL? Is this by design? Or is something missing from the patch? On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:19 AM, wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Tue Apr 19

TIL

2016-04-26 Thread Stefan Eissing
Today I Learned the difference between writing DATA + META and DATA + META + FLUSH to the core output filters. I am astonished that my code ever worked. Seriously, what is the reason for this kind of implementation? I would like to pass META buckets in non-blocking way and *not* lose the

Re: svn commit: r1740987 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style: latex/quickreference.xsl latex/synopsis.xsl xsl/quickreference.xsl xsl/synopsis.xsl

2016-04-26 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Yann, 2016-04-26 12:07 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Yann Ylavic > wrote: > > [CC docs@] > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM,

Re: svn commit: r1740987 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style: latex/quickreference.xsl latex/synopsis.xsl xsl/quickreference.xsl xsl/synopsis.xsl

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > [CC docs@] > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote: >>> Author: ylavic >>> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016 >>> New

Re: svn commit: r1740987 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style: latex/quickreference.xsl latex/synopsis.xsl xsl/quickreference.xsl xsl/synopsis.xsl

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
[CC docs@] On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote: >> Author: ylavic >> Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016 >> New Revision: 1740987 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1740987=rev >> Log: >>

Re: svn commit: r1740987 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style: latex/quickreference.xsl latex/synopsis.xsl xsl/quickreference.xsl xsl/synopsis.xsl

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM, wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Tue Apr 26 09:47:46 2016 > New Revision: 1740987 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1740987=rev > Log: > Introduce 'proxy section' context? This commit does not seem to work, I declared 'proxy section'

Re: svn commit: r1740928 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ include/ modules/http2/ modules/proxy/ modules/ssl/ server/

2016-04-26 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 04/26/2016 02:04 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote: >> static int ssl_hook_pre_connection(conn_rec *c, void *csd) >> { >> - >> SSLSrvConfigRec *sc; >> SSLConnRec *sslconn = myConnConfig(c); >> >> -if

Re: svn commit: r1740928 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ include/ modules/http2/ modules/proxy/ modules/ssl/ server/

2016-04-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 04/26/2016 02:04 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Tue Apr 26 00:04:57 2016 > New Revision: 1740928 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1740928=rev > Log: > mod_proxy, mod_ssl: Handle SSLProxy* directives in sections, > allowing different TLS configurations per