Re: [PATCH] mod_mime and virtual requests

2002-09-05 Thread Ryan Bloom
Hmm. We might not even need the fixup. Now that *every* handler is executed nowadays, we can probably just remove the concept of dav-handler and move those checks in type_checker/fixups into dav_handler() itself. Hmm. Perhaps. I'll take a look at it. -- justin Small problem with

Re: [PATCH] mod_mime and virtual requests

2002-09-05 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:14:42AM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote: Hmm. We might not even need the fixup. Now that *every* handler is executed nowadays, we can probably just remove the concept of dav-handler and move those checks in type_checker/fixups into dav_handler() itself. Hmm.

[PATCH] mod_mime and virtual requests

2002-09-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
This patch does the following things: - Morphs ap_run_sub_req-invoked handler's DONE to OK. (Fixes mod_dav always returning DONE and mod_include treating it as an error.) - Adds 'ModMimeUsePathInfo' flag directive which tells mod_mime to use the full URI to do type lookups rather than

Re: [PATCH] mod_mime and virtual requests

2002-09-04 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: This patch does the following things: - Morphs ap_run_sub_req-invoked handler's DONE to OK. (Fixes mod_dav always returning DONE and mod_include treating it as an error.) How is a subrequest normally involved in a

Re: [PATCH] mod_mime and virtual requests

2002-09-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 05:26:13PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: How is a subrequest normally involved in a plain old GET against an SVN repository? Or was this to solve another situation? Well, my website uses virtual includes and all the pages are stored within SVN, so one SVN-served file causes