Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Leif W
"Nick Kew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:11 GMT-5 I agree the documentation should be better. Also we should properly document the perchild-like options, since that is frequently-requested. In the meantime, here's a list of things to look at if you want perchild-like: * Metux MPM * m

Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Nick Kew
On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:10, Leif W wrote: > Hi, sorry if this is off-topic, but I just want to make sure I > understand this problem. Last month I read an email on another list > (suPHP) in which someone was upset about the security of Apache 2.0.x > with all file i/o and cgi being done b

RE: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Sander Striker
> From: Leif W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:10 PM [...] > It's already a huge list of workaround and compatibility and portability for > an admin could be a nightmare. I do not know if there are even more security > wrappers needed for other language modules. C

Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:10 AM 2/10/2005, Leif W wrote: >I'm just trying to understand where the breakdown is. A feature that people >want, the lack of which spawns a sloppy slew of incompatible workarounds, but >no one around to respond and code it or fix what's available. The strength of >Apache was always *ni

Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Leif W
"Nick Kew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:15 GMT-5 On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:10, Leif W wrote: Hi, sorry if this is off-topic, but I just want to make sure I understand this problem. Last month I read an email on another list (suPHP) in which someone was upset about the security of A

Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Leif W
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:35 GMT-5 From: Leif W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:10 PM things which might commonly be used in concert? Is there any "direction" given from "the top" of the Apache group in regards to what gets attention? No

Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Leif W
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:57 GMT-5 At 08:10 AM 2/10/2005, Leif W wrote: I'm just trying to understand where the breakdown is. A feature that people want, the lack of which spawns a sloppy slew of incompatible workarounds, but no one around to respond and code it

Re: UNIX MPMs [ot?]

2005-02-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
Leif W wrote: > > My only concern is, if some people solved the puzzle externally, then > are there barriers which prevent them from getting the code committed? > > The Metux web pages (official and unofficial) seem to be works in > progress. There is a quote which indicates that at least the