Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-30 Thread Graham Leggett
Paul Querna wrote: mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and mod_cache do too!) What happened to all functions that are not inside server/* must be either dynamic optional functions or hooks? Doesn't anyone remember t

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-30 Thread M. Brian Akins
On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Paul Querna wrote: mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and mod_cache do too!) What happened to all functions that are not inside server/* must be either dynamic optional functions or hoo

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-30 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Maybe a more layered approach would be something to consider for 3.0? Seems to me that the layers and groups of modules keeps expanding and expanding. 2.0 -> 2.2 had the whole auth move over so maybe it's time to rethink the current module system for 3.0? ~Jorge On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:25 A

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-30 Thread Bertrand Mansion
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:25 AM, M. Brian Akins wrote: > As I hack on some lua stuff, it's useful to have the symbols for functions. >  That may just be because I'm lazy, because I could do optional function > lookups in library opens, I suppose.  OT, but I like my Lua glue in a lua > module and

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-30 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Paul Querna > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. März 2009 01:37 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: what is in modules vs what is in the core > > mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose > additional functions to the API. (mod_pr

Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Mladen Turk
Paul Querna wrote: mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and mod_cache do too!) So, you came back from different direction, cool :) If you really like to put the watchdog functionality inside the mpm (and IMO that's

RE: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread David Martínez Albiter
prueba -Original Message- From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm] Sent: Lunes, 30 de Marzo de 2009 08:03 p.m. To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core Paul Querna wrote: > mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules t

Lua and memcache was Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Akins, Brian
> OT, but will you contribute that to mod_lua ? :) Based on mod_memcache and mod_wombat . For demonstration only as this uses our hacked version, but you get the idea how simple this was. Build it in lua dir like /usr/lib/lua/5.1/apach2/memcache.so -- Brian Akins Chief Operations Engineer Tur

Re: Lua and memcache was Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Bertrand Mansion
Le 31 mars 09 à 15:52, Akins, Brian a écrit : OT, but will you contribute that to mod_lua ? :) Based on mod_memcache and mod_wombat . For demonstration only as this uses our hacked version, but you get the idea how simple this was. Build it in lua dir like /usr/lib/lua/5.1/apach2/memc

Re: Lua and memcache was Re: what is in modules vs what is in the core

2009-03-31 Thread Akins, Brian
On 3/31/09 10:18 AM, "Bertrand Mansion" wrote: > Reading the comments in your code, it seems that mod_lua could benefit > from a better error reporting ? Perhaps. Or I just needed to actually add error checking Right now I rely on the lua side to sanity check stuff. -- Brian Akins Chief O