Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-31 Thread Issac Goldstand
Nick Kew wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: > >> imo, no one uses these mpms, we should delete them. > > ISTR having this conversation ahead of 2.2. We deleted > them from 2.2 but left them in trunk for posterity, > and in case anyone felt like picking it up. > > They look like obvious candidates for

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-31 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/31/2009 04:17 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: > >> imo, no one uses these mpms, we should delete them. > > ISTR having this conversation ahead of 2.2. We deleted > them from 2.2 but left them in trunk for posterity, > and in case anyone felt like picking it up. > > They look li

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-31 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/31/2009 02:59 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> On 01/30/2009 03:48 AM, field...@apache.org wrote: +AP_DECLARE(int) ap_unixd_setup_child(void); /* mod_cgid needs this */ + >>>

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-30 Thread Nick Kew
Paul Querna wrote: imo, no one uses these mpms, we should delete them. ISTR having this conversation ahead of 2.2. We deleted them from 2.2 but left them in trunk for posterity, and in case anyone felt like picking it up. They look like obvious candidates for an attic now. -- Nick Kew

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-30 Thread Paul Querna
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >>> On 01/30/2009 03:48 AM, field...@apache.org wrote: +AP_DECLARE(int) ap_unixd_setup_child(void); /* mod_cgid needs this */ + >>> >>> Hm. This break compil

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-30 Thread Nick Kew
Roy T. Fielding wrote: It bothers me that I really have no idea if this code even works, given that it is supposedly the heart of a seteuid switching child (or some such). I would really appreciate it if someone who actually uses this stuff could decide what should be deleted *before* we releas

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-30 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 01/30/2009 03:48 AM, field...@apache.org wrote: +AP_DECLARE(int) ap_unixd_setup_child(void); /* mod_cgid needs this */ + Hm. This break compilation of trunk as this symbol is now added

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-30 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 01/30/2009 03:48 AM, field...@apache.org wrote: Author: fielding Date: Fri Jan 30 02:48:08 2009 New Revision: 739150 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=739150&view=rev Log: revert r711228: the ap_unixd_setup_child prototype needs to go

Re: svn commit: r739150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/os/unix/unixd.h

2009-01-30 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/30/2009 03:48 AM, field...@apache.org wrote: > Author: fielding > Date: Fri Jan 30 02:48:08 2009 > New Revision: 739150 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=739150&view=rev > Log: > revert r711228: the ap_unixd_setup_child prototype needs to go somewhere. > > Modified: > httpd/ht