Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-03-03 Thread Danny Chan
narios and look > > forward > > > to > > > > > supporting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > > > > > 发件人: > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-02-05 Thread Raymond Xu
t; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ 原始邮件 -- > > > > 发件人: > > > > "dev" > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-31 Thread Vinoth Chandar
have encountered such scenarios and look forward > to > > > supporting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > > > 发件人: > > > "dev" >

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-20 Thread Raymond Xu
; < > > danny0...@apache.org>; > > 发送时间: 2021年1月19日(星期二) 下午4:25 > > 收件人: "dev" > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields > > > > > > > > > Wonder

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-19 Thread Pratyaksh Sharma
;; > 发送时间: 2021年1月19日(星期二) 下午4:25 > 收件人: "dev" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields > > > > > Wondering if we should just take a bunch of payload configs and > deprecate > these flags > > I have the same feeling, there are already so m

?????? [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-19 Thread ??????
+1?? Currently we have encountered such scenarios and look forward to supporting --  -- ??: "dev"

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-19 Thread Danny Chan
> Wondering if we should just take a bunch of payload configs and deprecate these flags I have the same feeling, there are already so many config options in Hoodie, the maintain work for developers or users is hard. Vinoth Chandar 于2021年1月18日周一 下午11:40写道： > +1 as well. > > Slightly orthogonal p

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-18 Thread Vinoth Chandar
+1 as well. Slightly orthogonal point. Wondering if we should just take a bunch of payload configs and deprecate these flags? What I mean is : --source-ordering-field ultimately is used by the HoodieAvroPayload class (or its family). Our utilities expose these as flags for convenience, but its ju

Re: [DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-18 Thread vino yang
+1, We have found that such flexibility is needed in some scenarios. Best, Vino Raymond Xu 于2021年1月17日周日 上午3:38写道： > Just want to discuss a small improvement for setting ordering fields. > For > - property `hoodie.payload.ordering.field` and > - deltastreamer --source-ordering-field > I think

[DISCUSS] Support multiple ordering fields

2021-01-16 Thread Raymond Xu
Just want to discuss a small improvement for setting ordering fields. For - property `hoodie.payload.ordering.field` and - deltastreamer --source-ordering-field I think it can be useful to support multiple fields (configured via a comma-separated list) to determine the order in some cases. This wou