Hi,
On 7/28/07, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
> >
> >http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
>
> All sigs and hashes good. However, I am getting test failures on
> OS X 10.4.10 (PPC) with java vers
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> still can't create new issues. Is this:
> [...]
> the same problem others are seeing?
There's a number of problems being reported on various forums. They
are all caused by Jira running out of memory and starting to act
strangely. The lat
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.3.1/
All sigs and hashes good. However, I am getting test failures on
OS X 10.4.10 (PPC) with java version "1.5.0_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5
We are not planning to backport the data store patch to 1.3 release.
We'd like to know if is it better, in terms of stability, to have the
patch applied to 1.3.1 release instead of the revision the latest
version of the patch was applied to (revision # 553213)
Thanks,
Pablo
-Original Message-
On 7/27/07, Mohammed ATMANE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to integrate jackrabbit in an architecture SOA, where there are many
> applications that need to save some data in the repository, the question is
> can i access to the repository with webservices.
>
> thanks.
> MATMANE
>
T
Hello,
I need to integrate jackrabbit in an architecture SOA, where there are many
applications that need to save some data in the repository, the question is
can i access to the repository with webservices.
thanks.
MATMANE
--
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Pablo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm asking just for a the patch (i.e.: "dataStore5.patch"), that can be
> applied to the revision of JR 1.3.1 release.
If you need the data store functionality already now, before
Jackrabbit 1.4, I would strongly suggest that you use a snaps
> Did you already try out this feature?
Yes. The serialization issue with large binary objects is truly critical
for our project.
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 12:29 PM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira]
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgra
Yes, it would be great !
We've started working on a DataStore implementation based on a dbms. We
can share that work when it get in well form.
Thanks,
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 12:15 PM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.o
Hi,
Sure, I can create such a patch. However it will take some time. Did
you already try out this feature?
Thomas
On 7/27/07, Pablo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm asking just for a the patch (i.e.: "dataStore5.patch"), that can be
> applied to the revision of JR 1.3.1 release.
>
> Thanks
I'm asking just for a the patch (i.e.: "dataStore5.patch"), that can be
applied to the revision of JR 1.3.1 release.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 12:12 PM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented:
Sorry, maybe I misunderstood the question. Do you like me to update
the patch for Jackrabbit 1.3.1?
Thomas
On 7/27/07, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the wrong person to ask, but I don't think so... It's a new
> feature and requires changes in a few internal APIs.
>
> Juk
Hi,
I'm the wrong person to ask, but I don't think so... It's a new
feature and requires changes in a few internal APIs.
Jukka?
Thomas
Thomas, will the binaries data store patch be available for the revision
of Jackrabbit 1.3.1 release ?
Thanks,
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 6:57 AM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (JCR-9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516032
]
Antonio Carballo commented on JCR-1037:
---
It will take us several days to do so. Let's see what we can come up to
+1 Release the packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
successfully compiled from source and ran automated tests on w2k with java 6.
cheers
stefan
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> > People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
> > It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
> > requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgrading
> > Ji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516009
]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-1037:
The more you can simplify the test case while still preserving the problem the
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgrading
Jira in a short while and will then be able to explicitly limit the
size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516008
]
Antonio Carballo commented on JCR-1037:
---
Yes. Session.save() is called after every add/update of a every document
Hi,
On 7/27/07, Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a reason that the bundle persistence manager ddl for posgresql
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-889) was not applied to 1.3.1 ?
> Can this be slipped in ? :)
It's a feature issue and not a bug fix. I try to put on
Hi,
People have been asking about the recent unstability of the ASF Jira.
It seems like the culprit is some external client that keeps
requesting huge query results. The infrastructure team is upgrading
Jira in a short while and will then be able to explicitly limit the
size of query results, whic
Sorry I'm late...
Is there a reason that the bundle persistence manager ddl for posgresql
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-889) was not applied to 1.3.1 ?
Can this be slipped in ? :)
Thanks,
Florent
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515995
]
Stefan Guggisberg commented on JCR-964:
---
> Noah Vihinen commented on JCR-964:
> --
25 matches
Mail list logo
