: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 January 2012 10:59
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
>
> On 19 January 2012 09:13, Mark Collin wrote:
>> Oh this has highlighted another difference between the implementation
>>
gt;>
>> I'll look at it in a bit more anger in a couple of hours to provide
>> some more useful feedback.
>>
>> Ant-contrib is used in the patch I have supplied to loop through a
>> couple of lists and add in an if/else block that will allow you to
>> c
POM that
>>> was not correctly referencing ApacheJMeter_parent.
>>>
>>> The final version will also automatically download ant-contrib if you
>>> don't have it to make the whole process easier.
>>
>> I don't think we need the ant-contrib; so long
t POM.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Collin [mailto:m...@ardescosolutions.com]
Sent: 19 January 2012 09:09
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: RE: Publishing to Maven Central
OK I have tried using the 2.6-SNAPSHOT at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ and I ge
gs it isn't needed.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2012 23:39
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
>
> On 18 January 2012 22:45, Mark Collin wrote:
ant to do
these things it isn't needed.
Regards
Mark
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 January 2012 23:39
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
On 18 January 2012 22:45, Mark Collin wrote:
> Uploaded a final version just now
n [mailto:m...@ardescosolutions.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2012 14:10
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Publishing to Maven Central
>
> I was trying to find a way that would use a unified dependency list for both
> the ant build and the maven deploy.
>
> The path I have
x27;t
have it to make the whole process easier.
Let me know if it needs any more tweaking.
Regards
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Collin [mailto:m...@ardescosolutions.com]
Sent: 18 January 2012 14:10
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: RE: Publishing to Maven Central
I was trying to f
I've added what I currently have to the bug.
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 January 2012 12:41
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
On 18 January 2012 12:30, Mark Collin wrote:
> It looks like you have specified al
ebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 January 2012 12:41
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
On 18 January 2012 12:30, Mark Collin wrote:
> It looks like you have specified all of the dependencies in the
> ApacheJMeter_parent pom.
>
> I thought you wanted a unifi
On 18 January 2012 05:04, Ian Brandt wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> IMO Maven works well for some projects, particularly single component
>> (module) builds.
>> Multi-module Maven does not work as well; in particular the test phase
>> requires the project to be (re)instal
ng dependency list in ApacheJMeter_parent pom?
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2012 10:56
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
>
> On 18 January 2012 06:35, Mark Collin wrote:
>> I'm
e.org
Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
On 18 January 2012 06:35, Mark Collin wrote:
> I'm in the progress of writing my second attempt at providing a
> working maven solution which you can see here:
It looks to me like an Ant build script using Maven deploy, i.e. Maven is
not u
2 10:56
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
On 18 January 2012 06:35, Mark Collin wrote:
> I'm in the progress of writing my second attempt at providing a
> working maven solution which you can see here:
It looks to me like an Ant build script using Maven deploy,
en see if the result is usable.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Brandt [mailto:i...@ianbrandt.com]
> Sent: 18 January 2012 05:04
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Publishing to Maven Central
>
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> IMO M
build.properties as maybe a saner way
to do things which will won't touch the existing build.xml at all, although
I'm not that happy with this solution either.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Brandt [mailto:i...@ianbrandt.com]
Sent: 18 January 2012 05:04
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Su
On Jan 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, sebb wrote:
> IMO Maven works well for some projects, particularly single component
> (module) builds.
> Multi-module Maven does not work as well; in particular the test phase
> requires the project to be (re)installed first.
Understood. I like Steve Ebersole's writ
On 17 January 2012 21:59, Ian Brandt wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm shifting discussion to here from "Bug 49753 - Please publish jMeter
> artifacts on Maven central repository" [1].
>
> Considering an outright switch to Maven is a no go [2],
IMO Maven works well for some projects, particularly si
18 matches
Mail list logo