Hi,
The KIP has received 3 binding votes from Justine Olshan, Jun Rao and Colin
McCabe.
Also thanks to Jeff Kim, Jack Vanlightly, Artem Livshits, David Arthur,
David Jacot for the comments to make the KIP better.
Thanks for the help!
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:20 AM Calvin Liu wrote:
> Hi Colin,
Hi Colin,
Thanks for the feedback. I have updated the KIP but with the following
changes.
--The request is still grouped by topics. For each topic, the caller can
specify either partition IDs or a range of partitions to query. If it is a
range query, the request should specify the "first partition
Hi Calvin,
Thanks for the KIP. I think the config discussion was good and I have no more
comments there.
I have one last thing I think we should fix up:
I think we should improve DescribeTopicRequest. The current mechanism of "you
can only list 20 topics" doesn't do a very good job of limiting
Hi, Calvin,
Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me too.
Jun
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:28 PM Justine Olshan
wrote:
> Thanks Calvin.
> I think this will be very helpful going forward to minimize data loss.
>
> +1 from me (binding)
>
> Justine
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Calvin Liu
> wrote:
>
>
Thanks Calvin.
I think this will be very helpful going forward to minimize data loss.
+1 from me (binding)
Justine
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Calvin Liu
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-966 which includes a series of
> enhancements to the current ISR model.
>
>- I
