SUCCESS! [0:47:29.586134]
+ 1
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:33 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:49:28.580122]
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:57 AM Robert Muir wrote:
> >
> > I change my vote to +1 based on Julie's test. It fails for me with
> > 9.4.0 and passes for me with 9.4.1
> >
SUCCESS! [0:49:28.580122]
+1
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 5:57 AM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> I change my vote to +1 based on Julie's test. It fails for me with
> 9.4.0 and passes for me with 9.4.1
>
> :lucene:core:test (SUCCESS): 1 test(s)
>
> > Task :lucene:core:wipeTaskTemp
> The slowest tests (exceedi
I change my vote to +1 based on Julie's test. It fails for me with
9.4.0 and passes for me with 9.4.1
:lucene:core:test (SUCCESS): 1 test(s)
> Task :lucene:core:wipeTaskTemp
The slowest tests (exceeding 500 ms) during this run:
8511.54s TestManyKnnVectors.testLargeSegment (:lucene:core)
The slo
