thanks for the pointer!
I have added it to the Lucene FAQ
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/LuceneFAQ#LuceneFAQ-HowisLucene'sindexingandsearchperformancemeasured?
Thanks
Michael
Am 06.05.23 um 06:18 schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya:
Check Lucene bench: https://home.apache.org/
Apologies for not replying yesterday and thank you, Greg, for answering the
question.
All I could add is that it's a pretty common semantic versioning scheme
[1], although there is no rigorous method of policing it - very often it's
just relying on common sense. Lucene often does add big code chan
Got it! Thanks!
Ishan Chattopadhyaya 于2023年5月6日周六 12:19写道:
> Check Lucene bench: https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/
>
> On Sat, 6 May, 2023, 9:30 am donghai tang, wrote:
>
>> Hello Lucene Community,
>>
>> I am in the process of learning about Lucene's indexing capabilities, and
>>
Check Lucene bench: https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/
On Sat, 6 May, 2023, 9:30 am donghai tang, wrote:
> Hello Lucene Community,
>
> I am in the process of learning about Lucene's indexing capabilities, and
> I'm keen on conducting experiments to evaluate its performance. However
Hello Lucene Community,
I am in the process of learning about Lucene's indexing capabilities, and
I'm keen on conducting experiments to evaluate its performance. However, I
haven't come across any official tools specifically designed for measuring
Lucene's indexing performance.
I would be extreme
(non-binding) +1 SUCCESS! [1:22:45.096774]
Xugang
https://www.amazingkoala.com.cn/
Nhat Nguyen 于2023年5月5日周五 06:23写道:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:54:22.989202]
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 2:07 PM Patrick Zhai wrote:
>
>> (non-binding) +1
>> SUCCESS! [0:47:50.033079]
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 1:27 P
Hi Greg
IMO I still think the seekCeil is a better solution for the default posting
format, as it could potentially save time on traversing the FST by doing
the ping-pong skipping.
I can see that in the case of using bloom filter the seekExact might be
better but I'm not sure whether there is a bet
Hi Jonathan-
The main branch is the tip of development, and what will eventually become
10.0. It can use a later version of Java, make (some)
non-backwards-compatible API changes, etc. branch_9x tracks the latest 9.x
release, and must run on the version of Java supported by 9.x releases,
must be A
Hi folks-
Back in GH#12156 (https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12156), we rewrote
TermInSetQuery to extend MultiTermQuery. With this change, TermInSetQuery
can now leverage the various "rewrite methods" available to MultiTermQuery,
allowing users to customize the query evaluation strategy (e.g.
Thanks. What are the rules for what should go into main vs branch_9x?
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 1:54 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> The main branch is on Java 17, see build.gradle:
>
> // Minimum Java version required to compile and run Lucene.
> minJavaVersion = JavaVersion.VERSION_17
>
> Also, do
The main branch is on Java 17, see build.gradle:
// Minimum Java version required to compile and run Lucene.
minJavaVersion = JavaVersion.VERSION_17
Also, don't use the default gradle task created by convention; use this one:
./gradlew mavenToLocal
it's an alias but it publishes only a subs
Actually my hack doesn't work, the manifest file changes but the .class
files do not.
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> `./gradlew publishToMavenLocal` gives me Java 17 class files by default,
> which surprises me since AFAIK 11 is still the minimum to run Lucene.
>
> I hac
`./gradlew publishToMavenLocal` gives me Java 17 class files by default,
which surprises me since AFAIK 11 is still the minimum to run Lucene.
I hacked it to work by editing javac.gradle
sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
Is there a c
PR is here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12265
Am 05.05.2023 um 11:48 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
Hi,
I let the smoker run with Policeman Jenkins, result is here:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/26/console
SUCCESS! [1:16:17.355285]
I also did some manual checks, e
Hi,
I let the smoker run with Policeman Jenkins, result is here:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/26/console
SUCCESS! [1:16:17.355285]
I also did some manual checks, especially for parts that I maintain:
* Luke started fine with Java 11, Java 17, Java 19, Java 20.
* Lu
15 matches
Mail list logo