Re: maven-eclipse-plugin failing on hudson - help needed.

2009-06-22 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM, John Casey wrote: >> This would seem to be the result of some path that's taken for granted to be >> a certain way, but for some reason is different out on hudson. >> >> Have you tried to the path from the a

Re: maven-eclipse-plugin failing on hudson - help needed.

2009-06-22 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM, John Casey wrote: > This would seem to be the result of some path that's taken for granted to be > a certain way, but for some reason is different out on hudson. > > Have you tried to the path from the antrun plugin, or else use an > absolute path like: > > ${proj

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC4 & Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-22 Thread Brett Porter
I'll try and get some time to look through these, as I have some questions from what I've seen at a glance. It looks like you need to temporarily add the Wagon staging repo to the POM so that the hudson build will succeed though. - Brett On 23/06/2009, at 10:03 AM, John Casey wrote: Hi e

Re: maven-eclipse-plugin failing on hudson - help needed.

2009-06-22 Thread Brett Porter
You might try adding ${basedir} into the src attribute, but strange that it would try to run anywhere but the current directory. I assume that that file is properly checked out, which you should be able to check in Hudson. FTR, it runs fine on my machine too (Mac). - Brett On 23/06/2009,

Re: maven-eclipse-plugin failing on hudson - help needed.

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
This would seem to be the result of some path that's taken for granted to be a certain way, but for some reason is different out on hudson. Have you tried to the path from the antrun plugin, or else use an absolute path like: ${project.basedir}/verify-integration-tests-checks.bsh Just a few

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC4 & Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
Okay, the correct staging repository URL for Maven 2.2.0-RC4 is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-007/ Remember, this version contains the staged version of Wagon 1.0-beta-6. Thanks, -john John Casey wrote: Ugh, that Maven repository location is wrong. I'm re-s

maven-eclipse-plugin failing on hudson - help needed.

2009-06-22 Thread Barrie Treloar
This builds fine on my machine (windows xp) and on people.apache.org. I dont know why this is failing on hudson. I do not have ANT on my path for either of the machines that build successfully - that is why the dependencies are included in the antrun plugin configuration. Could I ask for some mor

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC4 & Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
Ugh, that Maven repository location is wrong. I'm re-staging this RC, and I'll post the staging repository once that's done. Sorry for the confusion. -john John Casey wrote: Hi everyone, As I'm sure you're aware, I've tried twice now to get a clean vote done for Maven 2.2.0. In each case, w

[PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.2.0-RC4 & Maven Wagon 1.0-beta-6

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
Hi everyone, As I'm sure you're aware, I've tried twice now to get a clean vote done for Maven 2.2.0. In each case, we've run into blocking bugs that have caused me to retract the vote and fix the code. Well, with the latest bug that Brian found, we're now dependent on some configuration upd

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread nicolas de loof
Just as a side note, I don't thing the wiki page http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.2.0+Release+Plan is up to date with current release candidate, is it ? Nicolas 2009/6/22 John Casey > I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got > a proposed next relea

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
I've added this sort of configuration, but I need to document it. I've got a proposed next release of wagon staged, and as soon as I get the documentation for this configuration done, I'll call the vote. -john Brett Porter wrote: On 20/06/2009, at 2:29 AM, Brian Fox wrote: This is probably

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-22 Thread John Casey
done. I'll finish up the log4j stuff this morning and hopefully have a new RC out for testing this afternoon. Benjamin Bentmann wrote: John Casey wrote: Okay, I'm retracting this vote to fix: MNG-4210 MNG-4213 As a suggestion, probably worth to consider merging MNG-4179 in from the 2.2.x

Re: [Vote] Release Doxia-1.1.1 and Doxia-Sitetools-1.1.1 (take two)

2009-06-22 Thread Lukas Theussl
Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Lukas Theussl wrote: Staging repos: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-019/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-020/ +1 in general, only the signatures for the POMs would need to be double-checked and fixed