On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Does this bundle have the same bits as the legal-bundle from genesis
> does?
Mostly yes. It's the same stuff, but with a couple of extra parameters
I added to allow the poms to inject some extra header/footer stuff if
wanted/needed. The "normal
+1
Vincent
2008/3/17, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
> need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
>
> The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/brows
Does this bundle have the same bits as the legal-bundle from genesis
does?
--jason
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the res
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-32
Many thanks to David Jencks f
+1
--
Olivier
2008/3/17, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
> need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
>
> The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/bro
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:06 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release apache-jar-resource-bundle version 1.4
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of t
+1
On 17-Mar-08, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing
around:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-32
