RE: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-31 Thread Brian E. Fox
>IMO, this is indicative of a need to allow a plugin to call back into >the core and resolve/retrieve the project's dependencies (and it's >not the only case; see any of the IDE plugins). I'm not sure that I'm >actually using a different resolver implementation, though...I don't >remember

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-30 Thread John Casey
On Jul 30, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I've added code in 2.2-beta-2-snap to address this problem...at least, it should address it. I added resolution to the plugin before 2.2-beta-1 because there were issues when people wanted to create an assembly that didn't require depende

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 12:27 AM 30 Jul 07, John Casey wrote: I've added code in 2.2-beta-2-snap to address this problem...at least, it should address it. I added resolution to the plugin before 2.2-beta-1 because there were issues when people wanted to create an assembly that didn't require depe

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-29 Thread John Casey
I've added code in 2.2-beta-2-snap to address this problem...at least, it should address it. I added resolution to the plugin before 2.2-beta-1 because there were issues when people wanted to create an assembly that didn't require dependencies to be resolved, and the dependencies couldn't b

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-29 Thread Brett Porter
Since John's on holidays you probably won't get a full answer for a little bit, but I took a quick dig in the svn logs and would guess: - this was to work around limitations in the artifact resolver (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=438528) - it delegates to the original artifact