I've also deployed a 2.3 SNAPSHOT (2.3-20090531.103812-3), hope this will
fix issues on dependending projects
2009/5/31 Benjamin Bentmann
> nicolas de loof wrote:
>
> I've reverted the trunk to pre-MCHECKSTYLE-105.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Should I set version to "3.0" in this branch to show the bre
nicolas de loof wrote:
I've reverted the trunk to pre-MCHECKSTYLE-105.
Thanks.
Should I set version to "3.0" in this branch to show the breaking
change with 2.x versions due to java5 requirement ?
IMHO, a minor increment would suffice. For users already building with
Java 1.5, the change
I've reverted the trunk to pre-MCHECKSTYLE-105.
I'll review this patch according to the issues detected in a dedicated java5
branch. Should I set version to "3.0" in this branch to show the breaking
change with 2.x versions due to java5 requirement ?
Nicolas
2009/5/30 nicolas de loof
> Sory, I
Sory, I missed time to follow this thread, thanks to benjamin for the ping.
I applied MCHECKSTYLE-105 patch as is and did not detect the breacking
changes, it can be rollbacked - I will check MCHECKSTYLE-101later.
Following the thread about plugin and Java5 I've created a branch for
checkstyle plu
2009/5/20 Mark Hobson :
> Just noticed this thread after posting a proposed solution to mojo-dev:
> http://markmail.org/message/qnipbser4hktewvq
I've fixed this in mojo-parent, do you want me to also apply the fix
to maven-parent and deploy a new snapshot?
Mark
--
2009/5/20 Paul Gier :
> This change [1] breaks the site generation for a lot of projects.
> Specifically, the checkstyle plugin config in the maven parent pom depends
> on the file maven_checks.xml in trunk of the checkstyle plugin. This should
> probably be changed in the parent pom to point to
