On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> is there any reason why this stupid Hudson *always* fail when we commit some
> new code, and one hour later come back with again 6 useless mails telling us
> that "Hey, sorry, I was totally f*cked up last time I sent you 6 mails" ?
I do
Ok, guys,
sorry for my overreaction...
Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
If we look at the build history, we see that we don't have that many
failures. The problem is that those failures seems to be time-dependent.
The JDK 1.6/Windows build are also in constant failure, a
What I want to say is : get this bloddy 2.0 out, and let's bury it. It's
dead code, it's a cancer we can't fix. Any time we spend on it is a
waste, and slow down our work on MINA 3.0.
We have some issues like DIRMINA-764, but it can be worked around on the
client side, and can't be fixed on the
Opened SSHD-76 with more info.
Thanks,
Bernd
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 18:05, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm not aware of any problem like that.
> Are you connecting to a native ssh server or the one from SSHD ?
> Also could you try to set the log level to DEBUG on the client side
> and see if yo
Sounds like you are pissed now, try to breath ;)
I'm agree for releasing 2.0 now.
Julien
Le Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:53:28 +0100,
Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
> Ok, guys,
>
> sorry for my overreaction...
>
> Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
>
> If we look at the build histor
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Sounds like you are pissed now, try to breath ;)
> I'm agree for releasing 2.0 now.
+1
/niklas
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Ok, guys,
>
> sorry for my overreaction...
>
> Sure we have to check what's going on with the builds.
>
> If we look at the build history, we see that we don't have that many
> failures. The problem is that those failures seems to be time
Hi guys,
I know this will not be the perfect version, but it's not that bad. We
have some pending issues that can probably be fixed in a 2.0.1 or later,
but the base services are pretty much correctly covered.
Here are the currently pending issues :
DIRMINA-539 : Pb on TraficClass for datagram
[X] +1, yes get 2.0 out now
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I know this will not be the perfect version, but it's not that bad. We have
> some pending issues that can probably be fixed in a 2.0.1 or later, but the
> base services are pretty much correctly co
Some thoughts about how to manage Idle sessions :
In order to manage idle sessions, we should use a separated thread which
will check periodically that the session has been used or not. We use a
boolean flag which is reset when we read of write on this session, and
switch to true when we check
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Some thoughts about how to manage Idle sessions :
>
> In order to manage idle sessions, we should use a separated thread which
> will check periodically that the session has been used or not. We use a
> boolean flag which is reset when we
11 matches
Mail list logo
