On 9/29/10 3:53 PM, Mark Webb wrote:
I assume the API will be backwards compatible though, right?
Right, as much as we can, but if we can't we should absolutely provide
some clear and documented path for migration.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
I assume the API will be backwards compatible though, right?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 9/28/10 4:36 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm afraid that MINA 3.0 will be a total rewrite, with no way to get
>>> fixes
>>> from 2.0... I consider 2.0 as dead wood at
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Ashish wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> yesterday I reviewed the Service interface and the associated hierarchy.
>> basically, we have either Acceptors or Connectors.
>>
>> From those two interfaces, we derive :