All,
Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity
We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote?
David
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2019 7:09 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Simple Workflow Proposal
Aga
] - votes must say [VOTE]
To:
+1 binding
On 2019/12/22 15:13:03, David Sidrane wrote:
> All,
>
> Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity
>
> We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote?
>
> David
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
+1 binding
On 2019/12/22 15:13:03, David Sidrane wrote:
> All,
>
> Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity
>
> We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote?
>
> David
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December
+1
(sorry, I couldn't help it)
On 12/22/2019 9:13 AM, David Sidrane wrote:
All,
Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity
We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote?
David
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2
I thought I was being humorous in replying with +1. But [VOTE] is in
the title so I guess this is a real, binding vote. That wasn't clear
from the text. I am so confused. Anway, my +1 vote still stands, just
not as funny anymore.
On 12/22/2019 9:14 AM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
+1
(sorry, I co
I thought I was being humorous in replying with +1. But [VOTE] is in
the title so I guess this is a real, binding vote. That wasn't clear
from the text. I am so confused. Anway, my +1 vote still stands,
just not as funny anymore.
You did not mention how long the vote will be open for.
I thought I was being humorous in replying with +1. But [VOTE] is in
the title so I guess this is a real, binding vote. That wasn't clear
from the text. I am so confused. Anway, my +1 vote still stands,
just not as funny anymore.
You did not mention how long the vote will be open for.
+1
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019, 17:45 Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > I thought I was being humorous in replying with +1. But [VOTE] is in
> > the title so I guess this is a real, binding vote. That wasn't clear
> > from the text. I am so confused. Anway, my +1 vote still stands,
> > just not as funny an
HI,
> Also, if you don't specify the criteria for accepting the vote, I assume that
> it must be a simple majority of those who vote.
Votes, are almost never a simple majority, releases come close where a -1 is
not a veto but you need 3 +1 votes. Please see [1] and [2]. For most decision
make
