yes, I think we should get 1.1.1 out of the door the next 2 weeks anyway ;)
For now I did just commit things which improve our current behaviour in
non-BDA mode with Weld.
An example: in Seam3 some interceptors are defined over and over again in each
jar. This used to lead to a WebBeansConfig
>>>Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from
early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps?
+1.
Gurkan
Kimden: Joseph Bergmark
Kime: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Gönderildiği Tarih: 12 Ağustos 2011 22:13 Cuma
Konu: Re: [jira]
Should we separate owb 1.1 (which is an cdi 1.0 implementation) from
early cdi 1.1 work somehow? A new branch perhaps?
Joe
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) wrote:
> Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1
> specification
> -
Incorporate enhanced BeanArchive handling of the preliminary CDI-1.1
specification
--
Key: OWB-603
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-603
Project: OpenWebBean
