Thank you, Pavan and everyone.
Could you conclude this vote, William?
Dongjoon.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 7:44 AM Pavan Lanka
wrote:
> Thanks @Dongjoon for the clarification.
>
> +1 for the release
>
> * Test the java build and tests using OpenJDK 11
> * Reviewed the list of issues
>
> > On Jan
Thanks @Dongjoon for the clarification.
+1 for the release
* Test the java build and tests using OpenJDK 11
* Reviewed the list of issues
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 9:42 PM, Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>
> In the previous email, the following was a typo. 1.8.2 and 1.7.9 are the
> correct versions which I
+1
Thank you, Dongjoon, Gang, Yiqun, Junwang, Pavan, and Deshan, for your
participation.
Bests,
William
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:54 PM deshan xiao wrote:
>
> +1 for the release.
>
> As for ORC-1343 (Ignore orc.create.index), we need more careful
> implementation to avoid any issue in reader &
+1 for the release.
As for ORC-1343 (Ignore orc.create.index), we need more careful
implementation to avoid any issue in reader & writer. This is not an urgent
issue in the current release.
BTW, I am very willing to re-implement it in the next release.
Thanks,
Deshan Xiao
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 a
In the previous email, the following was a typo. 1.8.2 and 1.7.9 are the
correct versions which I wanted to mention.
```
- Implementing is not the scope of urgent 1.8.1 and 1.7.7 releases.
+ Implementing is not the scope of urgent 1.8.2 and 1.7.9 releases.
```
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:29 PM Dong
Thank you, Pavan.
1. Yes, it's intentional. First, we cannot remove the added public API.
That's the main reason why we couldn't revert the commit physically. This
discussion happended on the original PR. Second, we keep the added test
case by marking 'ignored' because we want to re-enable the tes
I wanted to follow up on ORC-1343 (Ignore orc.create.index).
* The discussion in the Jira seems to indicate that we want to revert ORC-1283,
but the included changes are not a full revert, was that intentional?
* I think any files created with the previous version of the writer with index
as fal
+1
build and tested on macOS Monterey Version 12.6.
Thanks for driving this, William.
Regards,
Junwang Zhao
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:47 AM William H. wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ORC version 1.7.8.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ORC 1.7.8
>
+1
Thank you for driving this release, William.
Best,
Yiqun
Gang Wu 于2023年1月17日周二 12:40写道:
> +1
>
> Thanks for driving this, William.
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:17 PM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thank you so much, William.
> >
> > Dongjoon.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan
+1
Thanks for driving this, William.
Best,
Gang
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:17 PM Dongjoon Hyun
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you so much, William.
>
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 1:47 PM William H. wrote:
>
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ORC version
> > 1.7.8
+1
Thank you so much, William.
Dongjoon.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 1:47 PM William H. wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ORC version
> 1.7.8.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ORC 1.7.8
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> TAG:
> https://g
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ORC version 1.7.8.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ORC 1.7.8
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
TAG:
https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/v1.7.8-rc0
RELEASE FILES:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/orc/v1.7.8
12 matches
Mail list logo