>> This is a variation of one of the cases described in Guillaume's paper
>> on error messages. Figure 4 of
>> http://gmarceau.qc.ca/papers/Marceau-2010-Measuring-Effectiveness.pdf
>
> Yes, I agree. Are you suggesting that there's low-hanging fruit in the form
> of a more general solution?
I'm
On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>>
>> "Ho Ho!" thought I. "Beginner Student Racket will give a much better error
>> message." Actually, though, the error message was much worse: it highlighted
>> the id "list-sum-odd" in what should have been the 'else' case, and wrote:
>>
>> "l
Yes, and it was submitted in some form as a bug before. Why don't you modify
teach.rkt and see whether you like the result better. Then submit.
On Feb 10, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>>
>> "Ho Ho!" thought I. "Beginner Student Racket will give a much better error
>> message." Actu
>
> "Ho Ho!" thought I. "Beginner Student Racket will give a much better error
> message." Actually, though, the error message was much worse: it highlighted
> the id "list-sum-odd" in what should have been the 'else' case, and wrote:
>
> "list-sum-odd: expected a function call, but there is no o
A user on stackoverflow had a question about this code:
(define list-sum-odd
(lambda (list)
(cond
((null? list) 0)
((odd? (car list)) (+ (car list) (list-sum-odd (cdr list
(list-sum-odd (cdr list)
(list-sum-odd '(3 4 5))
... which signalled an error. In #lang rac
Eli Barzilay wrote at 02/09/2012 09:27 PM:
([2] What Neil VD said.)
It's just "Neil V." -- no social diseases.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
An hour and a half ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Apparently I was confused, and didn't realize that this wasn't a
> > discussion but a change that is already the default.
>
> I put it there to make easy for people to see it in one of the more
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Apparently I was confused, and didn't realize that this wasn't a
> discussion but a change that is already the default.
I put it there to make easy for people to see it in one of the more
prominent places where it will appear, not because "th
+1
At Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:34:31 +, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Robby Findler
> > wrote:
> > > John Clements and Neil Toronto have put together a new Racket logo
> > > that I've just
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:00:37 -0700
Jordan Schatz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:04:41PM -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > > I prefer keeping the lambda in it.[1] Also "r" is much less
> > > unique.[2]
>
> 1+ (or 1!)
+wau
-> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFLkou8NvJo
s.
--
"This is why Sci
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:04:41PM -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > I prefer keeping the lambda in it.[1] Also "r" is much less
> > unique.[2]
1+ (or 1!)
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
11 matches
Mail list logo
