Hi Leonard,
Thanks so much for the advice. Using summary(nls(...)) I can get the
coefficient values, making life a lot easier. To see some of the implemented
code, visit the wiki:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/R_and_Calc_Documentation#summary.28.29_Hack_for_Complex_R_Objects
Also, I u
I will be out of office until June 4th. Thanks
James Dixon
Chief Geek, Pentaho Corp
Citadel International, Suite 340, 5950 Hazeltine National Dr. , Orlando, FL
32822, USA
+1 407 812-OPEN (6736), Fax: 407-517-4575
Toll Free: 1-866-496-2703
Hi Wojciech,
this issue is really tough. Indeed, my first response probably still
holds. It is still the most simple solution to use:
s <- summary(the_nls_object)
and retrieve the information from 's'.
Yes, I know this is probably a suboptimal solution. In the meantime, I
have serious doubts
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 31 May 2007 02:35:21 -0400
Von: "Wojciech Gryc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: dev@sc.openoffice.org
Betreff: Re: [sc-dev] Calc Add-in Questions (and bugs?)
> Thanks very much for the advice, I'll definitely be using it...
>
> With regards to function ca
Hi Muthu,
On Monday, 2007-05-28 21:51:39 +0530, Muthu Subramanian wrote:
> I fixed i56202 in msba01.
> [http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56202]
Beside being on the wrong branch and needs to be resynced to SRC680,
as Niklas already mentioned, the CWS lacks the following informat
