DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39040] - Refactor Struts initialization to ServletContextListener

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r390119 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: faqs.xml kickstart.fml products.fml

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 30 05:27:18 2006 New Revision: 390119 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390119&view=rev Log: FAQs * Add "newbie" and "roots" FAQs Added: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/faqs.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/kickstart

svn commit: r390123 - /struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 30 05:30:36 2006 New Revision: 390123 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390123&view=rev Log: Product FAQ * Typo. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/site/tr

svn commit: r390125 - /struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 30 05:36:01 2006 New Revision: 390125 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390125&view=rev Log: Product FAQ * Typo. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/products.fml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/site/tr

svn commit: r390135 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: index.xml kickstart.fml

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 30 05:55:32 2006 New Revision: 390135 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390135&view=rev Log: kickstart FAQ * Newbie - Condense opening paragraphs Welcome * Typo. Update links. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/kickstart

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39155] New: - Faces context not found

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

Ted Husted wrote: STATUS so far - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.ti - WebWork* classes -> Struts* - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. - ww: tag prefix -> a: +1 Don Brown, Martin Cooper (bin

RE: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

At 7:54 AM +0200 3/30/06, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi And now we have come full circle: You suggest to use Strings in forms, but if you do - do not blame Struts? So, lets stick with Struts, and use Double and Floats etc. We know that this does not work because of RequestUtils. So my statem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39156] New: - [Shale] client side commons validation not working inside a dataList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39156] - [Shale] client side commons validation not working inside a dataList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39156] - [Shale] client side commons validation not working inside a dataList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

This may be a dumb suggestion but why not implement a lightweight action class that's in StrutsAction and then if a user chooses they can use the full support of XWork. I'm not sure where you draw the line (you'd probably want validation) but I cant see why you couldn't implement a few of the inter

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

On 3/30/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin makes a good point -- even my suggestion about how to populate > non-string properties of ActionForms doesn't address displaying them > -- the form tags don't know enough to apply any locale sensitive > formatting when refilling a field.

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

On what framework would this solution you are describing run? Are you talking about running Struts 1.x actions inside Action 2? If so, that is something that has been started in the sandbox, but not fully developed. I'd like to hear more. Don Eric Molitor wrote: This may be a dumb suggestio

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

At 8:55 AM -0800 3/30/06, Don Brown wrote: Are you talking about running Struts 1.x actions inside Action 2? If so, that is something that has been started in the sandbox, but not fully developed. I'd like to hear more. Don: where is this, exactly? and if you have the time, what's the stat

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

The code is in sandbox/ti/phase1/jars/legacy I believe, although I recently started moving it to sandbox/action2/legacy, but got stuck trying to make a Maven 2 build work. The code is still in an exploratory stage, but there is conversion code to turn Action 2 objects into Action 1 equivalences,

svn commit: r390199 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/action2: README.txt apps/mailreader/src/java/mailreader2/Constants.java apps/mailreader/src/java/mailreader2/Welcome.java apps/mailreader/src/webapp/WEB-

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 30 10:05:24 2006 New Revision: 390199 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390199&view=rev Log: Action2 Apps * Mailreader Tour ** Tweaks, up to "Logon.do" Modified: struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/README.txt struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/apps/mailreader/src/ja

[Struts Wiki] Trivial Update of "EventActionDispatcher" by MichaelJouravlev

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EventActionDispatcher The comment on the change is: Updated wording -

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

Well what I've been toying with is two things the first isn't directly related but might be of interest. At the SpringExperience there were some discussions about integrating SpringWebflow into webwork and I started playing with some code. What I ended up with was a weird WebFlowAction that could

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

Sure, a custom ActionInvocation instance could even invoke a Struts Action as is. The question is how you handle ActionForms. Do you implement the Struts request processing chain as Interceptors? Add an Interceptor that calls a chain? Action 2 already has the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor which

svn commit: r390220 - /incubator/webwork2/src/java/org/apache/struts/action2/dispatcher/DispatcherUtils.java

Author: mrdon Date: Thu Mar 30 11:21:39 2006 New Revision: 390220 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390220&view=rev Log: Fixing Spring object factory not loading correctly due to new class name Modified: incubator/webwork2/src/java/org/apache/struts/action2/dispatcher/DispatcherUtils.ja

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

At 11:07 AM -0800 3/30/06, Don Brown wrote: Sure, a custom ActionInvocation instance could even invoke a Struts Action as is. The question is how you handle ActionForms. Do you implement the Struts request processing chain as Interceptors? Add an Interceptor that calls a chain? Action 2 alr

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

Don, I was refering to phase I really, whether the starting point is Webwork or Webwork + XWork. Also, it seems from the documents on the project (if I am not incorrect) that XWork would still be a strong part of phase II and that there are Struts centric modifications to it that we might wa

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

On 3/30/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don, > > I was refering to phase I really, whether the starting point is Webwork or > Webwork + XWork. I think Don is saying that it would be helpful to see a concrete proposal from the XWork developers that outlines what they would like to do. Once

svn commit: r390256 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/action2: ./ apps/mailreader/src/java/ apps/mailreader/src/java/mailreader2/ apps/mailreader/src/webapp/pages/

Author: husted Date: Thu Mar 30 14:08:42 2006 New Revision: 390256 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390256&view=rev Log: Action2 Apps * README - Add notes for new cookbook examples and new features (culled from WW Forum) * Mailreader Tour ** Up to Logon-validation.xml Modified: strut

[Proposal] Dissolve the Struts Flow subproject

I propose that we dissolve the Struts Flow subproject, moving it into the sandbox. I'm saddened to write this because I'm still very excited about the possibilities of using continuations and Javascript at the server controller level, but I just don't see me having the time to create a proper re

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

Gabe wrote: Don, I was refering to phase I really, whether the starting point is Webwork or Webwork + XWork. Also, it seems from the documents on the project (if I am not incorrect) that XWork would still be a strong part of phase II and that there are Struts centric modifications to it tha

Struts Roadmap

Should not the roadmap page be revised?[1] Do commiters expect any other versions in 1.x generation besides 1.3.x? I guess the answer is "Yes, if something happens and it will be needed, or if someone steps up to do it just for kicks". But should not the roadmap reflect situation when "nothing happ

Re: Struts Roadmap

As Martin pointed out in another thread, many people, including several committers, have Struts Action 1.3 applications in production. The heavy lifting is done, and a initial 1.3.0 build is available for testing. It's just a matter of someone finding the time to wrap up the 1.3.1 release plans, a

Re: [Proposal] Dissolve the Struts Flow subproject

On 3/30/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I propose that we dissolve the Struts Flow subproject, moving it into the > sandbox. I'm saddened to write this because > I'm still very excited about the possibilities of using continuations and > Javascript at the server controller level, but

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35389] - [taglib] equal tag doesn't work with huge numbers

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r390327 - /struts/taglib/trunk/src/tld/struts-html.tld

Author: mrdon Date: Thu Mar 30 21:10:28 2006 New Revision: 390327 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390327&view=rev Log: Enabling EL on dynamicJavascript attribute in javascript tag PR: 35895 Modified: struts/taglib/trunk/src/tld/struts-html.tld Modified: struts/taglib/trunk/src/tld/str

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35895] - Attributes with false in TLD prevent EL evaluation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r390335 - in /struts/action/trunk/src: java/org/apache/struts/action/ActionRedirect.java test/org/apache/struts/action/TestActionRedirect.java

Author: mrdon Date: Thu Mar 30 21:43:56 2006 New Revision: 390335 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390335&view=rev Log: Adding anchor support, method chaining, and better ActionForward copying to ActionRedirect. Thanks to Frank W. Zammetti and Christopher Schultz for the analysis and patch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36037] - Allow query strings and anchors when returning forwards from Action

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38964] - [taglib] Postback Forms - Caching and Modules

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsTaglibRelease131" by DonBrown

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DonBrown: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTaglibRelease131 The comment on the change is: Updating tickets, removing N/A tickets -

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

Joe, see below Joe Germuska schrieb: > At 7:54 AM +0200 3/30/06, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> And now we have come full circle: You suggest to use Strings in forms, >> but if you do - do not blame Struts? >> >> So, lets stick with Struts, and use Double and Floats etc. We know >> tha

Towards a stable 1.3 release

Ok, as I understand the current system, we'd need a GA release of all the subprojects, including Action 1, in order to declare a GA 1.3 release. How much work does those involved think this will be? If a bit, I'm thinking it might be easier in the long run to go ahead, consolidate the subproj